National Study of Non-urgent Emergency Department Visits and Associated Resource Utilization
Authors:
Open Access
- 19 November 2013
- journal article
- Published by Western Journal of Emergency Medicine in Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 14 (6) , 609-616
Abstract
Introduction: Reducing non-urgent emergency department (ED) visits has been targeted as a method to produce cost savings. To better describe these visits, we sought to compare resource utilization of ED visits characterized as non-urgent at triage to immediate, emergent, or urgent (IEU) visits.Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the 2006-2009 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Urgency of visits was categorized using the assigned 5-level triage acuity score. We analyzed resource utilization, including diagnostic testing, treatment, and hospitalization within each acuity categorization.Results: From 2006-2009, 10.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-11.2) of United States ED visits were categorized as non-urgent. Most (87.8% [95%CI, 86.3-89.2]) non-urgent visits had some diagnostic testing or treatment in the ED. Imaging was common in non-urgent visits (29.8% [95%CI, 27.8-31.8]), although not as frequent as for IEU visits (52.9% [95%CI, 51.6-54.2]). Similarly, procedures were performed less frequently for non-urgent (34.1% [95%CI, 31.8-36.4]) compared to IEU visits (56.3% [95%CI, 53.5-59.0]). Medication administration was similar between the 2 groups (80.6% [95%CI, 79.5-81.7] vs. 76.3% [95% CI, 74.7-77.8], respectively). The rate of hospital admission was 4.0% (95%CI, 3.3-4.8) vs. 19.8% (95%CI, 18.4-21.3) for IEU visits, with admission to a critical care setting for 0.5% of non-urgent visits (95%CI, 0.3-0.6) vs. 3.4% (95%CI, 3.1-3.8) of IEU visits.Conclusions: For most non-urgent ED visits, some diagnostic or therapeutic intervention was performed. Relatively low, but notable proportions of non-urgent ED visits were admitted to the hospital, sometimes to a critical care setting. These data call into question non-urgent ED visits being categorized as “unnecessary,” particularly in the setting of limited access to timely primary care for acute illness or injury. [West J Emerg Med.609-616.]Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding and Interpreting the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: Key Questions and AnswersAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2012
- Comparison of an Informally Structured Triage System, the Emergency Severity Index, and the Manchester Triage System to Distinguish Patient Priority in the Emergency DepartmentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2011
- ED patients: how nonurgent are they? Systematic review of the emergency medicine literatureThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2011
- Accountable Care Organizations: The Case For Flexible Partnerships Between Health Plans And ProvidersHealth Affairs, 2011
- An observational study of patients triaged in category 5 of the Emergency Severity IndexEuropean Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2010
- Use of an emergency department by nonurgent patientsThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Nonurgent Emergency Department Patient Characteristics and Barriers to Primary CareAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Reliability and Validity of a New Five‐level Triage InstrumentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2000
- Use of the ED as a Regular Source of Care: Associated Factors Beyond Lack of Health InsuranceAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- Determinants of Emergency Department Use by Ambulatory Patients at an Urban Public HospitalAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995