Atomic Dynamic Flow Games: Adaptive vs. Nonadaptive Agents
- 1 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Operations Research
- Vol. 69 (6) , 1680-1695
Abstract
We propose a game model for selfish routing of atomic agents, who compete for use of a network to travel from their origins to a common destination as quickly as possible. We follow a frequently used rule that the latency an agent experiences on each edge is a constant transit time plus a variable waiting time in a queue. A key feature that differentiates our model from related ones is an edge-based tie-breaking rule for prioritizing agents in queueing when they reach an edge at the same time. We study both nonadaptive agents (each choosing a one-off origin–destination path simultaneously at the very beginning) and adaptive ones (each making an online decision at every nonterminal vertex they reach as to which next edge to take). On the one hand, we constructively prove that a (pure) Nash equilibrium (NE) always exists for nonadaptive agents and show that every NE is weakly Pareto optimal and globally first-in first-out. We present efficient algorithms for finding an NE and best responses of nonadaptive agents. On the other hand, we are among the first to consider adaptive atomic agents, for which we show that a subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) always exists and that each NE outcome for nonadaptive agents is an SPE outcome for adaptive agents but not vice versa.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Intersection-Movement-Based Dynamic User Optimal Route Choice ProblemOperations Research, 2013
- Existence of simultaneous route and departure choice dynamic user equilibriumTransportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2013
- Braess’s Paradox for Flows over TimeTheory of Computing Systems, 2013
- Existence of optima and equilibria for traffic flow on networksNetworks and Heterogeneous Media, 2013
- Competitive routing over timeTheoretical Computer Science, 2011
- Equilibrium Results for Dynamic Congestion GamesTransportation Science, 2010
- A Strategic Model for Dynamic Traffic AssignmentNetworks and Spatial Economics, 2004
- How bad is selfish routing?Journal of the ACM, 2002
- Strong Equilibrium in Congestion GamesGames and Economic Behavior, 1997
- Dynamic traffic assignment by individual path minimization and queuingTransportation Research, 1971