Advanced Urologic Cancer Consensus Conference (AUC3) 2025: Expert consensus on the management of renal cell and urinary tract cancers
Authors:
- Rana R. McKayRMRana R. McKay
- Wanling XieWXWanling Xie
- David AggenDADavid Aggen
- Laurence AlbigesLALaurence Albiges
- Andrea ApoloAAAndrea Apolo
- Michael B. AtkinsMAMichael B. Atkins
- Rick BangsRBRick Bangs
- Kathryn E. BeckermannKBKathryn E. Beckermann
- Joaquim BellmuntJBJoaquim Bellmunt
- Stephanie A. BergSBStephanie A. Berg
- Mehmet A. BilenMBMehmet A. Bilen
Open Access
- 13 December 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
- Vol. 76 (1) , e70052
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urinary tract cancer (UTC) has transformed dramatically, creating complexity in treatment selection and sequencing. The 2025 Advanced Urologic Cancer Consensus Conference was convened to establish evidence‐based expert consensus recommendations for optimal management. A multidisciplinary panel of 51 experts participated in a modified Delphi process addressing questions developed through iterative consensus‐building covering RCC and UTC management. Voting occurred before and after the conference, and analyses focused on postmeeting responses. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus as >90%. Strong consensus was found on the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab for higher risk RCC (pathologic T2 [pT2], grade 4; pT3–pT4, any grade; pTXN1; or fully resected metastatic disease) and on neoadjuvant therapy before cystectomy for localized UTC. There was strong consensus on the use of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab as frontline therapy for metastatic UTC and the use of platinum‐based chemotherapy postprogression in biomarker‐negative UTC. For RCC, there was consensus on the role of single‐agent vascular endothelial growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy after progression on frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy or dual immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. However, there was a lack of consensus on other critical areas in the management of RCC and UTC. The 2025 Advanced Urologic Cancer Consensus Conference provides evidence‐informed guidance for complex clinical scenarios while identifying critical research priorities. The group recognizes that the lack of consensus across multiple areas highlights the need for improved patient selection and prospective studies enabling optimal combination and sequencing approaches. This iterative annual process will address evolving treatment paradigms to optimize outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- ctDNA guiding adjuvant immunotherapy in urothelial carcinomaNature, 2021
- Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2021
- Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2021
- Does Ureteral Stenting Increase the Risk of Metachronous Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Bladder Tumors? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisJournal of Urology, 2021
- Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2021
- Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in First-line Treatment of Patients with Advanced Sarcomatoid Renal Cell CarcinomaClinical Cancer Research, 2020
- Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2019
- Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2018
- Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- Lenvatinib, everolimus, and the combination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2015