Position-Based Quantum Cryptography: Impossibility and Constructions
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM) in SIAM Journal on Computing
- Vol. 43 (1) , 150-178
Abstract
In this work, we study position-based cryptography in the quantum setting. The aim is to use the geographical position of a party as its only credential. On the negative side, we show that if adversaries are allowed to share an arbitrarily large entangled quantum state, the task of secure position-verification is impossible. To this end, we prove the following very general result. Assume that Alice and Bob hold respectively subsystems $A$ and $B$ of a (possibly) unknown quantum state $|\psi\rangle \in {\cal H}_A \otimes {\cal H}_B$. Their goal is to calculate and share a new state $|\varphi\rangle = U|\psi\rangle$, where $U$ is a fixed unitary operation. The question that we ask is how many rounds of mutual communication are needed. It is easy to achieve such a task using two rounds of classical communication, whereas, in general, it is impossible with no communication at all. Surprisingly, in case Alice and Bob share enough entanglement to start with and we allow an arbitrarily small failure probability, we show that the same task can be done using a single round of classical communication in which Alice and Bob exchange two classical messages. Actually, we prove that a relaxed version of the task can be done with no communication at all, where the task is to compute instead a state $|\varphi'\rangle$ that coincides with $|\varphi\rangle = U|\psi\rangle$ up to local operations on $A$ and on $B$, which are determined by classical information held by Alice and Bob. The one-round scheme for the original task then follows as a simple corollary. We also show that these results generalize to more players. As a consequence, we show a generic attack that breaks any position-verification scheme. On the positive side, we show that if adversaries do not share any entangled quantum state but can compute arbitrary quantum operations, secure position-verification is achievable. Jointly, these results suggest the interesting question whether secure position-verification is possible in case of a bounded amount of entanglement. Our positive result can be interpreted as resolving this question in the simplest case, where the bound is set to zero. In models where secure position-verification is achievable, it has a number of interesting applications. For example, it enables secure communication over an insecure channel without having any preshared key, with the guarantee that only a party at a specific location can learn the content of the conversation. More generally, we show that in settings where secure position-verification is achievable, other position-based cryptographic schemes are possible as well, such as secure position-based authentication and position-based key agreement.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simplified instantaneous non-local quantum computation with applications to position-based cryptographyNew Journal of Physics, 2011
- Entanglement consumption of instantaneous nonlocal quantum measurementsNew Journal of Physics, 2010
- The uncertainty principle in the presence of quantum memoryNature Physics, 2010
- Quantum teleportation scheme by selecting one of multiple output portsPhysical Review A, 2009
- Asymptotic Teleportation Scheme as a Universal Programmable Quantum ProcessorPhysical Review Letters, 2008
- A Proof of the Security of Quantum Key DistributionJournal of Cryptology, 2006
- Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channelsPhysical Review Letters, 1993
- Can we make sense out of the measurement process in relativistic quantum mechanics?Physical Review D, 1981
- States and observables in relativistic quantum field theoriesPhysical Review D, 1980
- A Measure of Asymptotic Efficiency for Tests of a Hypothesis Based on the sum of ObservationsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1952