Risk of Major Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events in Users of Lisdexamfetamine and Other Medications for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Denmark and Sweden: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Authors:
- Joan FornsJFJoan Forns
- Elena DudukinaEDElena Dudukina
- David HäggDHDavid Hägg
- Péter SzentkútiPSPéter Szentkúti
- Karin GembertKGKarin Gembert
- Estel PlanaEPEstel Plana
- Alicia GilsenanAGAlicia Gilsenan
- Erzsébet Horváth-PuhóEHErzsébet Horváth-Puhó
- Vera EhrensteinVEVera Ehrenstein
- Johan ReutforsJRJohan Reutfors
- Cristina RebordosaCRCristina Rebordosa
Open Access
- 26 August 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Neurology and Therapy
- Vol. 11 (4) , 1659-1676
Abstract
Introduction This study aimed to estimate risks of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients treated with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) compared with patients previously treated with other attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications (amphetamine, dexamphetamine, methylphenidate or atomoxetine). Methods This population-based cohort study used data from Danish and Swedish medical and administrative national registers. The LDX cohort included adult patients initiating LDX with at least 12 months’ data preceding first LDX dispensing (index date). A random sample of patients treated with at least one non-LDX ADHD medication in the 6–24 months (but not less than 6 months) before index date (previous-users cohort) were matched to LDX users on age, sex, region and calendar year. The primary outcome, a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACE), included first hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction or stroke and out-of-hospital coronary heart disease or cerebrovascular disease death. Incidence rates (IRs) and IR ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of MACE were estimated using Poisson regression. Results From Denmark/Sweden, 5516/40,163 LDX users and 27,494/200,389 previous users were included. In Denmark, IRs of MACE/1000 person-years (95% CI) were similar for LDX (1.63 [0.85–3.14]) and previous users (1.61 [1.28–2.01]). In Sweden, IRs (95% CI) were 1.40 (1.09–1.79) in LDX users and 1.17 (1.00–1.38) in previous users. Adjusted MACE IRRs (95% CI) for LDX versus previous use were 1.01 (0.48–2.13) in Denmark, 1.13 (0.75–1.71) in Sweden, and 1.10 (0.77–1.58) in the pooled analysis. Conclusion Our findings suggest little to no increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients treated with LDX compared with patients previously treated with other ADHD medications.Keywords
Funding Information
- Shire Pharmaceuticals, now part of the Takeda group of companies
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Systematic Review of the Safety of Lisdexamfetamine DimesylateCNS Drugs, 2014
- Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Adults With Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder Who Report Clinically Significant Impairment in Executive Function: Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled StudyThe Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2013
- A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted modelsStatistics in Medicine, 2013
- Amphetamines, Atomoxetine and the Risk of Serious Cardiovascular Events in AdultsPLOS ONE, 2013
- Risk of Serious Cardiovascular Problems with Medications for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderCNS Drugs, 2012
- Do prescription stimulants increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events?: A systematic reviewBMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 2012
- Methylphenidate and Risk of Serious Cardiovascular Events in AdultsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2012
- ADHD Medications and Risk of Serious Cardiovascular Events in Young and Middle-aged AdultsJAMA, 2011
- Atomoxetine and Cerebrovascular Outcomes in AdultsJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2009
- Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects ModelJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2005