Improved accuracy and precision of tracer kinetic parameters by joint fitting to variable flip angle and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data
- 19 October 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 76 (4) , 1270-1281
Abstract
Purpose: To improve the accuracy and precision of tracer kinetic model parameter estimates for use in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI studies of solid tumors.Theory: Quantitative DCE‐MRI requires an estimate of precontrastT1, which is obtained prior to fitting a tracer kinetic model. AsT1mapping and tracer kinetic signal models are both a function of precontrastT1it was hypothesized that its joint estimation would improve the accuracy and precision of both precontrastT1and tracer kinetic model parameters.Methods: Accuracy and/or precision of two‐compartment exchange model (2CXM) parameters were evaluated for standard and joint fitting methods in well‐controlled synthetic data and for 36 bladder cancer patients. Methods were compared under a number of experimental conditions.Results: In synthetic data, joint estimation led to statistically significant improvements in the accuracy of estimated parameters in 30 of 42 conditions (improvements between 1.8% and 49%). Reduced accuracy was observed in 7 of the remaining 12 conditions. Significant improvements in precision were observed in 35 of 42 conditions (between 4.7% and 50%). In clinical data, significant improvements in precision were observed in 18 of 21 conditions (between 4.6% and 38%).Conclusion: Accuracy and precision of DCE‐MRI parameter estimates are improved when signal models are fit jointly rather than sequentially. Magn Reson Med 76:1270–1281, 2016.Keywords
Funding Information
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder can distinguish between residual tumour and post-chemotherapy effectEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2013
- Uncertainty estimation in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRIMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2012
- DCE-MRI biomarkers of tumour heterogeneity predict CRC liver metastasis shrinkage following bevacizumab and FOLFOX-6British Journal of Cancer, 2011
- The accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in DCE-MRI of the breast at 3 TPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2009
- Phase I Evaluation of CDP791, a PEGylated Di-Fab′ Conjugate that Binds Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2Clinical Cancer Research, 2007
- Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Vascular Characteristics with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging—Initial ExperienceRadiology, 2004
- Improving image quality and T1 measurements using saturation recovery turboFLASH with an approximate K-space normalisation filterMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 2000
- Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imagingJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1997
- Spin‐lattice relaxation time measurement by means of a TurboFLASH techniqueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1993
- Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1987