New Voices, Old Beliefs: Forest Environmentalism Among New and Long‐Standing Rural Residents1
Authors:
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Rural Sociology
- Vol. 55 (2) , 214-232
Abstract
In the on‐going sociological debate over rural‐urban differences, rural conflict over natural resources is often attributed to environmental attitudes of new residents from urban areas. An alternative hypothesis is that new residents provide not new attitudes, but a new voice for attitudes already held by many local residents. Data from a survey of residents of communities near two national forests show little support for the hypothesis that residential status affects forest management attitudes, dissatisfaction, or action. The findings support the “new‐voice” thesis and show that it is often a female voice.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Polls, Pollution, and Politics Revisited Public Opinion on the Environment in the Reagan EraEnvironment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 1987
- Women of the Progressive Conservation Movement: 1900–1916Environmental History, 1984
- Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models1984
- Environmental ConcernEnvironment and Behavior, 1981
- The Analysis of Attitude ItemsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1980
- The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical EvidencePublic Opinion Quarterly, 1980
- Individual versus Public Rights: Implications of Support for Landuse Planning and ControlThe Journal of Environmental Education, 1978
- Attitudes Toward Land-Use Planning and Controlled Population Growth in Jackson HoleCommunity Development Society. Journal, 1977
- THE RURAL‐URBAN CONTINUUM1Sociologia Ruralis, 1966
- The Rural-Urban Continuum: Real but Relatively UnimportantAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1960