Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion
- 23 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 20 (3) , 489-496
Abstract
The need for clear reporting of randomized controlled trials has been emphasized recently. The CONSORT Statement has made evidence‐based suggestions for a checklist and a patient flow diagram. Adapting this for cluster randomized controlled trials presents particular challenges. Simple changes in the checklist and diagram for the completely randomized two level cluster randomized trials are suggested for discussion. An example taken from an unpublished trial demonstrates that these changes are less simple to implement, although extensions to electronic publications may be helpful. These suggestions should be formally evaluated. Further work is required to consider the cases of more levels and of stratified or pair‐matched cluster randomized trials. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 1999
- Zelen RandomizationControlled Clinical Trials, 1999
- Cluster randomised trials: time for improvementBMJ, 1998
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998
- The BMJ 's website scales upBMJ, 1998
- Guidelines are needed for evaluations that use cluster approachBMJ, 1997
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1996
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1986
- RANDOMIZATION BY CLUSTERAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1981