On the Convergence of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Data Science
Open Access
- 30 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MIT Press in Harvard Data Science Review
- Vol. 2 (2)
Abstract
Epidemiology, biostatistics, and data science are broad disciplines that incorporate a variety of substantive areas. Common among them is a focus on quantitative approaches for solving intricate problems. When the substantive area is health and health care, the overlap is further cemented. Researchers in these disciplines are fluent in statistics, data management and analysis, and health and medicine, to name but a few competencies. Yet there are important and perhaps mutually exclusive attributes of these fields that warrant a tighter integration. For example, epidemiologists receive substantial training in the science of study design, measurement, and the art of causal inference. Biostatisticians are well versed in the theory and application of methodological techniques, as well as the design and conduct of public health research. Data scientists receive equivalently rigorous training in computational and visualization approaches for high-dimensional data. Compared to data scientists, epidemiologists and biostatisticians may have less expertise in computer science and informatics, while data scientists may benefit from a working knowledge of study design and causal inference. Collaboration and cross-training offer the opportunity to share and learn of the constructs, frameworks, theories, and methods of these fields with the goal of offering fresh and innovate perspectives for tackling challenging problems in health and health care. In this article, we first describe the evolution of these fields focusing on their convergence in the era of electronic health data, notably electronic medical records (EMRs). Next we present how a collaborative team may design, analyze, and implement an EMR-based study. Finally, we review the curricula at leading epidemiology, biostatistics, and data science training programs, identifying gaps and offering suggestions for the fields moving forward.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toward Open-source EpidemiologyEpidemiology, 2018
- Hospital Readmission and Social Risk Factors Identified from Physician NotesHealth Services Research, 2017
- Privacy, security, and the public health researcher in the era of electronic health record researchOnline Journal of Public Health Informatics, 2016
- Assessing Occupancy and Its Relation to Healthcare-Associated InfectionsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2016
- Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics: Recent Research and Trends in the United StatesYearbook of Medical Informatics, 2015
- An Argument for a Consequentialist EpidemiologyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- Toward Reproducible Computational Research: An Empirical Analysis of Data and Code Policy Adoption by JournalsPLOS ONE, 2013
- Evaluating the Impact of Database Heterogeneity on Observational Study ResultsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation RatePLOS ONE, 2007
- External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”The Lancet, 2005