Comparison of Different Test Systems for Simultaneous Autoantibody Detection in Connective Tissue Diseases
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 1050 (1) , 327-339
Abstract
Abstract: The serological diagnosis of connective tissue diseases (CTDs) is based on the analysis of circulating autoantibodies to cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins (extractable nuclear antigens [ENAs]). The determination of autoantibody specificities supports the clinical diagnosis of the type of CTD and also often the prognosis of the disease. The former indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) technique still provides a useful screening method that currently is supplemented by a range of different techniques allowing the exact determination of single autoantibody specificities. These ENA profiling techniques include ELISA, immunoblotting, line‐blot assays, and flow cytometric bead‐based multiplex assays. The novel line immunoassay (LIA) from Mikrogen has been introduced in a recent study as a suitable technique for the simultaneous detection of autoantibodies in a routine clinical laboratory, providing comparable results as ELISA and ELiA (both from Pharmacia Diagnostics) (see Damoiseaux et al., this volume). In this study, LIAs from three different manufacturers were performed in 30 serum samples from patients with dermatological manifestations and 27 samples from SLE patients with renal involvement. The line assays from Mikrogen (recom Line/ANA/ENA), Innogenetics (Inno‐Lia ANA Update), and Imtec (ANA‐LIA) were compared for antigen composition, handling, and statistical analysis including sensitivity and concordance. Autoantibody frequencies detected by the Mikrogen, Innogenetics, and Imtec line assays were 14.0%, 19.3%, and 15.8% for RNP; 14.0%, 22.8%, and 14.0% for Sm; 26.3%, 31.6%, and 40.3% for SSA; 3.5%, 12.3%, and 14.0% for SSB; and 3.5%, 14.0%, and 10.5% for histones. Our studies show that the line assay format is an easy‐to‐use, sensitive, and specific method for ENA antibody detection in human sera.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Multiplexed Fluorescent Microsphere Immunoassay for Detection of Autoantibodies to Nuclear AntigensClinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2004
- Practical Evaluation of Methods for Detection and Specificity of Autoantibodies to Extractable Nuclear AntigensClinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2004
- Current concepts on diagnosis, autoantibodies and therapy in Sj gren's syndromeScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 2000
- Utility of anti‐Sm, anti‐RNP, anti–Ro/SS‐A, and anti–La/SS‐B (extractable nuclear antigens) detected by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis & Rheumatism, 1996
- Correlation of antibodies to ribosomal P protein with psychosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1992
- Association between Lupus Psychosis and Antiribosomal P Protein AntibodiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis & Rheumatism, 1982
- Serological Findings in Patients with “ANA-Negative” Systemic Lupus ErythematosusMedicine, 1981
- Anti‐ss‐a antibody and other antinuclear antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis & Rheumatism, 1980
- Antibodies to cytoplasmic antigens in lupus erythematosusArthritis & Rheumatism, 1977