How to ensure threatened species monitoring leads to threatened species conservation
Authors:
- Natasha M. RobinsonNatasha M. Robinson
- Ben C. ScheeleBSBen C. Scheele
- Sarah LeggeSarah Legge
- Darren M. SouthwellDSDarren M. Southwell
- Oberon CarterOCOberon Carter
- Mark LintermansMLMark Lintermans
- James Q. RadfordJRJames Q. Radford
- Anja SkroblinASAnja Skroblin
- Chris R. DickmanCDChris R. Dickman
- Jessica KoleckJKJessica Koleck
- Adrian F. WayneAWAdrian F. Wayne
- John KanowskiJKJohn Kanowski
- 31 August 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Management & Restoration
- Vol. 19 (3) , 222-229
Abstract
Summary: Monitoring is essential for effective conservation and management of threatened species and ecological communities. However, more often than not, threatened species monitoring is poorly implemented, meaning that conservation decisions are not informed by the best available knowledge. We outline challenges and provide best‐practice guidelines for threatened species monitoring, informed by the diverse perspectives of 26 conservation managers and scientists from a range of organisations with expertise across Australian species and ecosystems. Our collective expertise synthesised five key principles that aim to enhance the design, implementation and outcomes of threatened species monitoring. These principles are (i) integrate monitoring with management; (ii) design fit‐for‐purpose monitoring programs; (iii) engage people and organisations; (iv) ensure good data management; and (v) communicate the value of monitoring. We describe how to incorporate these principles into existing frameworks to improve current and future monitoring programs. Effective monitoring is essential to inform appropriate management and enable better conservation outcomes for our most vulnerable species and ecological communities.Keywords
Funding Information
- Australian Government's National Environmental Science Programme
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declinesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013
- Integrating Indigenous Ecological Knowledge and Science in Natural Resource Management: Perspectives from AustraliaEcology and Society, 2013
- A review of on-ground recovery actions for threatened freshwater fish in AustraliaMarine and Freshwater Research, 2013
- Improving biodiversity monitoringAustral Ecology, 2011
- Linking science and practice in ecological research and management: How can we do it better?Ecological Management & Restoration, 2011
- Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practicesTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2011
- Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent DeclinesScience, 2010
- The recovery programme for the Lord Howe Island Phasmid (Dryococelus australis) following its rediscoveryEcological Management & Restoration, 2009
- Applying quality assurance procedures to environmental monitoring data: a case studyJournal of Environmental Monitoring, 2009
- Importance of Well‐Designed Monitoring Programs for the Conservation of Endangered Species: Case Study of the Snail KiteConservation Biology, 2007