Population-Based Clinical Cancer Registration in Germany
Authors:
- Alexander KatalinicAKAlexander Katalinic
- Marco HalberMarco Halber
- Martin MeyerMMMartin Meyer
- Maren PflügerMPMaren Pflüger
- Andrea EberleAEAndrea Eberle
- Alice NenneckeANAlice Nennecke
- Soo-Zin Kim-WannerSKSoo-Zin Kim-Wanner
- Tobias HartzTHTobias Hartz
- Kerstin WeitmannKWKerstin Weitmann
- Andreas StangASAndreas Stang
- Christina JustenhovenCJChristina Justenhoven
- Bernd HolleczekBHBernd Holleczek
Open Access
Abstract
Introduction: In 2013, a new federal law obligated all German federal states to collect additional clinical data in population-based cancer registries as an active tool for monitoring and improving the quality of cancer care, increasing transparency and promoting health research. Now, 10 years later, the current status of the expanded cancer registration is presented, including current figures on cancer in Germany. Methods: Reporting of cancer is mandatory for physicians, and about 5 to 10 reports from different healthcare providers are expected for each case. A uniform national dataset of about 130 items is used, and reports are usually sent electronically to the registry. We used the most recent data available from cancer registries up to the year of diagnosis in 2019. We calculated incidence rates and 5-year relative survival (5YRS) for common cancers. Data on clinical outcomes and benchmarking based on quality indicators (QIs) from guidelines were provided by the Cancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein (CR SH). Results: All federal state cancer registries met most of the previously defined national eligibility criteria. Approximately 505,000 cancer cases were registered in 2019, with breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancer being the most common cancers. The age-standardised cancer incidence has slightly decreased during the last decade. and spatial heterogeneity can be observed within Germany. 5YRS for all cancers was 67% and 63% for women and men, respectively. Therapy data for rectal cancer in 2019–2021 from the CR SH are shown as an example: 69% of the registered patients underwent surgery, mostly with curative intent (84%) and tumour-free resection (91%). Radiotherapy was given to 33% of the patients, and chemotherapy was given to 40%. Three selected QIs showed differences between involved healthcare providers. Discussion: The implementation of population-based clinical cancer registration can be considered a success. Comprehensive recording of diagnosis, treatment and disease progression and the use of registry data for quality assurance, benchmarking and feedback have been implemented.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Textbook outcome as a composite outcome measure in non-small-cell lung cancer surgeryEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2020
- Time trends (2006–2015) of quality indicators in EUSOMA-certified breast centresEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2017
- Die kartografische Darstellung regionaler Unterschiede in der MorbiditätBundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 2017
- Toward a comprehensive cancer registration in GermanyEuropean Journal Of Cancer Prevention, 2017
- The Impact of Quality Variations on Patients Undergoing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database StudyEuropean Urology, 2017
- Uses of cancer registries for public health and clinical research in Europe: Results of the European Network of Cancer Registries survey among 161 population-based cancer registries during 2010–2012European Journal of Cancer, 2015
- Was können Klinische Krebsregister in Zukunft für die bevölkerungsbezogene Umsetzung evidenzbasierter Leitlinien leisten?Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2015
- Economic evaluation of cancer registration in Europe.2014
- Epidemiologische Krebsregister in DeutschlandBundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 2013
- periodR – an R Package to Calculate Long-term Cancer Survival Estimates Using Period AnalysisMethods of Information in Medicine, 2009