Apparent latent heat of evaporation from clothing: attenuation and “heat pipe” effects
Authors:
- George HavenithGHGeorge Havenith
- Mark G. RichardsMRMark G. Richards
- Xiaoxin WangXWXiaoxin Wang
- Peter BrödePBPeter Bröde
- Victor CandasVCVictor Candas
- Emiel Den HartogEHEmiel Den Hartog
- Ingvar HolmérIHIngvar Holmér
- Kalev KuklaneKKKalev Kuklane
- Harriet MeinanderHMHarriet Meinander
- Wolfgang NockerWNWolfgang Nocker
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Applied Physiology
- Vol. 104 (1) , 142-149
Abstract
Investigating claims that a clothed person's mass loss does not always represent their evaporative heat loss (EVAP), a thermal manikin study was performed measuring heat balance components in more detail than human studies would permit. Using clothing with different levels of vapor permeability and measuring heat losses from skin controlled at 34°C in ambient temperatures of 10, 20, and 34°C with constant vapor pressure (1 kPa), additional heat losses from wet skin compared with dry skin were analyzed. EVAP based on mass loss ( Emass) measurement and direct measurement of the extra heat loss by the manikin due to wet skin ( Eapp) were compared. A clear discrepancy was observed. Emass overestimated Eapp in warm environments, and both under and overestimations were observed in cool environments, depending on the clothing vapor permeability. At 34°C, apparent latent heat (λapp) of pure evaporative cooling was lower than the physical value (λ; 2,430 J/g) and reduced with increasing vapor resistance up to 45%. At lower temperatures, λapp increases due to additional skin heat loss via evaporation of moisture that condenses inside the clothing, analogous to a heat pipe. For impermeable clothing, λapp even exceeds λ by four times that value at 10°C. These findings demonstrate that the traditional way of calculating evaporative heat loss of a clothed person can lead to substantial errors, especially for clothing with low permeability, which can be positive or negative, depending on the climate and clothing type. The model presented explains human subject data on EVAP that previously seemed contradictive.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heat and Moisture Transfer with Sorption and Phase Change Through Clothing AssembliesTextile Research Journal, 2005
- Heat and Moisture Transfer with Sorption and Phase Change Through Clothing AssembliesTextile Research Journal, 2005
- Heat and water vapour transfer of protective clothing systems in a cold environment, measured with a newly developed sweating thermal manikinEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2004
- Experiment and Analysis of Combined Heat and Water Vapor Transfer Through Clothes with CondensationTextile Research Journal, 2003
- Clothing Thermal Insulation During SweatingTextile Research Journal, 2003
- A model of evaporation from the skin while wearing protective clothingInternational Journal of Biometeorology, 1998
- Coupled Heat and Mass Transfer Through Hygroscopic Porous Materials-Application to Clothing Layers.Sen'i Gakkaishi, 1997
- Moisture Sorption and Transport in Clothing During WearTextile Research Journal, 1996
- A Numerical Model of the Combined Diffusion of Heat and Water Vapor Through ClothingTextile Research Journal, 1986
- The Effect of Changing Humidity on the Insulation of Hygroscopic ClothingTextile Research Journal, 1965