Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews
Open Access
- 11 August 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by F1000 Research Ltd in F1000Research
- Vol. 9, 82
Abstract
Background: Systematic reviews (SR) can be classified by type depending on the research question they are based on. This work identifies and describes the most relevant methodological resources to conduct high-quality reviews that answer health care questions regarding prevalence, prognosis, diagnostic accuracy and effects of interventions. Methods: Methodological resources have been identified from literature searches and consulting guidelines from institutions that develop SRs. The selected resources are organized by type of SR, and stage of development of the review (formulation of the research question, development of the protocol, literature search, risk of bias assessment, synthesis of findings, assessment of the quality of evidence, and report of SR results and conclusions). Results: Although the different types of SRs are developed following the same steps, each SR type requires specific methods, differing in characteristics and complexity. The extent of methodological development varies by type of SR, with more solid guidelines available for diagnostic accuracy and effects of interventions SRs. This methodological toolkit describes the most up-to-date risk of bias instruments: Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool and Prediction model study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) for prognostic SRs, Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies tool (QUADAS-2) for diagnostic accuracy SRs, Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROB-2) and Risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions studies tool (ROBINS-I) for effects of interventions SRs, as well as the latest developments on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Conclusions: This structured compilation of the best methodological resources for each type of SR may prove to be a very useful tool for those researchers that wish to develop SRs or conduct methodological research works on SRsKeywords
Funding Information
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CP18/00007)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participantsThe Lancet Global Health, 2018
- Is dementia incidence declining in high-income countries? A systematic review and meta-analysisClinical Epidemiology, 2018
- Ribavirin for treating Crimean Congo haemorrhagic feverCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018
- Prevalence of frailty and prefrailty among community-dwelling older adults in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ Open, 2018
- 18F PET with florbetaben for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017
- Diagnostic test accuracy of self-reported frailty screening instruments in identifying community-dwelling older people at risk of frailty and pre-frailty: a systematic review protocolJBI Evidence Synthesis, 2017
- Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospitalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017
- Prognostic models for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: an exemplar systematic review and meta-analysisCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016
- Systematic reviews: a key tool for clinical and health decision makingRevista Espanola de Salud Publica, 2014
- Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: A framework for researching clinical outcomesBMJ, 2013