Ridge Augmentation Using Recombinant Bone Morphogenetic Protein‐2 Techniques: An Experimental Study in the Canine
Authors:
- Daniel S. ThomaDTDaniel S. Thoma
- Archie JonesAJArchie Jones
- Motofumi YamashitaMYMotofumi Yamashita
- Ryan EdmundsRERyan Edmunds
- Myron NevinsMNMyron Nevins
- David L. CochranDCDavid L. Cochran
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Periodontology
- Vol. 81 (12) , 1829-1838
Abstract
Background: The use of recombinant bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (rhBMP‐2) with a collagen carrier material has severe limitations in regards to space maintenance. The aim of this study was to test whether rhBMP‐2 combinations with allografts or a mesh enhance the regeneration of missing bone and the subsequent placement of dental implants.Methods: In five dogs, surgically created ridge defects were augmented using one of the following treatment modalities: 1) rhBMP‐2/absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) under a titanium mesh (Mesh); 2) rhBMP‐2/ACS plus canine freeze‐dried bone allograft; 3) rhBMP‐2/ACS plus canine demineralized freeze‐dried bone allograft (DFDBA); or 4) rhBMP‐2/ACS wrapped around a canine cancellous allograft block (Block Allograft). Eight weeks later, dental implants were placed in the augmented areas. The dogs were sacrificed 16 weeks after bone augmentation and specimens obtained for histologic and histomorphometric analyses.Results: All sites augmented with DFDBA, and one site with Block Allograft did not allow placement of dental implants. In all other sites, dental implants were placed. The area of regenerated bone ranged between 23.40 mm2 (freeze‐dried bone allograft) and 35.16 mm2 (Block Allograft). The greatest amount of bone was regenerated in the Block Allograft group ranging from 4.54 mm (at 1.5 mm), to 4.95 mm (at 3 mm), to 5.14 mm (at 4.5 mm). The least amount of bone was regenerated by the DFDBA group with values of 2.24 mm (at 1.5 mm), 2.84 mm (at 3 mm), and 3.34 mm (at 4.5 mm). Statistically significant differences were observed between DFDBA and block allograft at all three levels (P Conclusion: The combination of rhBMP‐2 and a block allograft provides the greatest ridge width of the four treatment options used in this canine ridge augmentation model.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Parathyroid Hormone Bound to a Synthetic Matrix for Guided Bone Regeneration Around Dental Implants: A Histomorphometric Study in DogsJournal of Periodontology, 2010
- Bone Response to Loaded Implants With Non‐Matching Implant‐Abutment Diameters in the Canine MandibleJournal of Periodontology, 2009
- Alveolar Ridge Augmentation With Titanium Mesh and a Combination of Autogenous Bone and Anorganic Bovine Bone: A 2‐Year Prospective StudyJournal of Periodontology, 2008
- Assessment of the potential of growth factors for localized alveolar ridge augmentation: a systematic reviewJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2008
- Bone morphogenetic protein‐2 enhances bone formation when delivered by a synthetic matrix containing hydroxyapatite/tricalciumphosphateClinical Oral Implants Research, 2007
- The Effect of rhBMP‐2 Around Endosseous Implants With and Without Membranes in the Canine ModelJournal of Periodontology, 2006
- Histologic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts in barrier membrane covered periodontal fenestration wounds and ectopic sites in dogsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2004
- Localized ridge augmentation using a micro titanium mesh: a report on 27 implants followed from 1 to 3 vears after functional loadingClinical Oral Implants Research, 1998
- The Tension-Stress Effect on the Genesis and Growth of TissuesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1989
- Bone: Formation by AutoinductionScience, 1965