Interventions on Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review of Evidence and Knowledge Gaps
Open Access
- 3 March 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Food and Nutrition Bulletin
- Vol. 46 (1_suppl) , S5-S18
Abstract
Background: Adequate fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake is important for health, yet populations globally are failing to meet recommendations. Objective: A scoping review to summarize available evidence of evaluations of interventions to increase F&V intake globally, focusing on target populations, intervention strategies, research methods, and summarizing their evaluated impacts. Methods: We searched PubMed and Web of Science in February 2023 for intervention studies in which dietary intake of fruit and/or vegetables were documented. Eligible studies included all age groups, excluding those targeting populations with specific disease-related conditions, such as cancer patients/survivors. Only articles published in English since 2012 were included in the review. Results: We identified 6338 articles, with 226 meeting inclusion criteria, comprising 223 unique studies and 284 intervention comparisons. Most comparisons occurred in high-income countries ( n = 192) compared to low- and middle-income countries ( n = 92). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 37.3%) and cluster RCTs (52.5%) were predominant. Interventions primarily targeted adults (31.7%), school-aged children (18.0%), children under-five (14.4%), and adolescents (13.7%), lasting an average of 24 weeks (range: 2 weeks to 20 years). Food-frequency questionnaires (59.2%) and 24-h recalls (26.8%) were the most used dietary assessment method. Health and nutrition communication (75.9%) was the most common intervention, utilizing interpersonal communication, mass media, and information-communication technology, often in combinations. Positive impacts on fruit (43.9%), vegetable (40.2%), and combined F&V intake (53.0%) were observed in nearly half the intervention comparisons. Conclusions: These findings highlight the predominance of health and nutrition communication interventions, predominantly in high-income countries, showing mixed success in improving F&V intake, emphasizing the need for context-specific strategies and standardized methodologies to design sustainable, cost-effective interventions for better diet quality and health outcomes. Plain language title: A literature review assessing what we know and do not know about efforts to improve fruit and vegetable intake across the world.Keywords
Funding Information
- CGIAR Trust Fund: https://www.cgiar.org/funders.
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Barriers to consumption of fruits and vegetables and strategies to overcome them in low- and middle-income countries: a narrative reviewNutrition Research Reviews, 2022
- Overview of dietary assessment methods for measuring intakes of foods, beverages, and dietary supplements in research studiesCurrent Opinion in Biotechnology, 2021
- Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017The Lancet, 2019
- Effectiveness of brief nutrition interventions on dietary behaviours in adults: A systematic reviewAppetite, 2018
- Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Children and Youth through Gardening-Based Interventions: A Systematic ReviewJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2017
- Availability, affordability, and consumption of fruits and vegetables in 18 countries across income levels: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) studyThe Lancet Global Health, 2016
- Low- and middle-income countries face many common barriers to implementation of maternal health evidence productsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2016
- Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult?Public Health, 2016
- How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real worldEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2009
- Dietary Assessment Methods among School-Aged Children: Validity and ReliabilityPreventive Medicine, 2000