Detection by Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays and Isolation of Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli Serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145 in Ground Beef
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
- Vol. 8 (5) , 601-607
Abstract
Six Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serogroups, which include O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145, are responsible for the majority of non–O157 STEC infections in the United States, representing a growing public health concern. Cattle and other ruminants are reservoirs for these pathogens; thus, food of bovine origin may be a vehicle for infection with non–O157 STEC. Methods for detection of these pathogens in animal reservoirs and in food are needed to determine their prevalence and to develop intervention strategies. This study describes a method for detection of non–O157 STEC in ground beef, consisting of enrichment in modified tryptic soy broth at 42°C, followed by real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays targeting stx1, stx2, and eae genes and the wzx gene in the O-antigen gene clusters of the six serogroups, and then immunomagnetic separation (IMS) followed by plating onto Rainbow® Agar O157 and PCR assays for confirmation of isolates. All ground beef samples artificially inoculated with 1–2 and 10–20 CFU/25 g of ground beef consistently gave positive results for all of the target genes, including the internal amplification control using the multiplex real-time PCR assays after enrichment in modified tryptic soy broth for a total of 24 h (6 h at 37°C and 18 h at 42°C). The detection limit of the real-time multiplex PCR assays was ∼50 CFU per PCR. IMS for O26, O103, O111, and O145 was performed with commercially available magnetic beads, and the IMS beads for O45 and O121 were prepared using polyclonal antiserum against these serogroups. A large percentage of the presumptive colonies of each serogroup picked from Rainbow Agar O157 were confirmed as the respective serogroups; however, the percent recovery of STEC O111 was somewhat lower than that of the other serogroups. This work provides a method for detection and isolation in ground beef and potentially other foods of non–O157 STEC of major public health concern.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bacteriophage-Based Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolates from Ground BeefFoodborne Pathogens and Disease, 2010
- Molecular Analysis as an Aid To Assess the Public Health Risk of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli StrainsApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008
- Identification of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli seropathotypes A and B by multiplex PCRMolecular and Cellular Probes, 2007
- Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli O157 and non-Shiga-toxigenic E. coli O157 respond differently to culture and isolation from naturally contaminated bovine faecesJournal of Applied Microbiology, 2007
- Supplementation of enrichment broths by novobiocin for detecting Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from food: a controversial useLetters in Applied Microbiology, 2007
- Screening food raw materials for the presence of the world's most frequent clinical cases of Shiga toxin-encoding Escherichia coli O26, O103, O111, O145 and O157International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2007
- A BIOSENSOR METHOD FOR DETECTION OF STAPHYLOCOCCAL ENTEROTOXIN A IN RAW WHOLE EGG*Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology, 2006
- Non‐O157 Shiga Toxin–ProducingEscherichia coliInfections in the United States, 1983–2002The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Detection by 5′-nuclease PCR of Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli O26, O55, O91, O103, O111, O113, O145 and O157:H7, associated with the world's most frequent clinical casesMolecular and Cellular Probes, 2004
- Strong Association Between Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli O157 and Virulence Genes stx 2 and eae as Possible Explanation for Predominance of Serogroup O157 in Patients with Haemolytic Uraemic SyndromeEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2003