Esthetic outcome of single implant crowns following type 1 and type 3 implant placement: a systematic review
- 23 January 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Vol. 26 (7) , 768-774
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the current review was to systematically appraise the esthetic outcome of soft tissue around single implant crowns following type 1 and type 3 implants placement in published dental literature.Materials and methods: A PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials search up to March 2013 was conducted for articles published in the dental literature and limited to human trials with no language restricted. Furthermore, the reference lists of related articles were systematically screened, and additional manual searches were also performed. The primary outcome was pink esthetics score (PES).Results: The electronic search in the database of PubMed, Embase, and the Cohrane Central Register of Controlled Trials resulted in the identification of 463 titles. These titles were initially screened by the two independent reviewers for possible inclusion. Screening the abstracts and titles led to 28 articles for future full‐text consideration. From these articles, 18 studies were excluded. Manual search identified one article. After quality assessment, eight studies were included in this review. This review showed that no significant difference of PES index could be found between type 1 and type 3 implant placement.Conclusion: According to the current evidence, short‐term esthetic outcomes of peri‐implant soft tissue did not show significant difference following type 1 and type 3 implants placement with well‐selected patients. However, caution should be taken for clinicians to extrapolate this result to all types of patients, as more randomized clinical trials are needed for long‐term soft‐tissue esthetic outcome in patients with high esthetic risk following type 1 implant placement. PES frequency, peri‐implant condition and other risk factors for peri‐implantitis are recommended to be reported for future studies.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alterations in soft tissue levels and aesthetics over a 16–22year period following single implant treatment in periodontally‐healthy patients: a retrospective case seriesJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2013
- Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow‐up of 5 yearsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2012
- A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 yearsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2012
- Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aestheticsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2011
- Immediate and conventional single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: 1-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aestheticsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2011
- Flap vs. “flapless” surgical approach at immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010
- Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zoneJournal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 2010
- Immediate Implant Placement Postextraction Without Flap ElevationJournal of Periodontology, 2009
- Ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in the dog: flap versus flapless surgeryJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2008
- Soft and hard tissue assessment of immediate implant placement: a case seriesClinical Oral Implants Research, 2007