Predictors of Unfavorable Therapeutic Response to Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure
Open Access
- 14 July 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
- Vol. 13 (7) , 330
Abstract
Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) with atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation has emerged as a promising therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and symptomatic heart failure (HF). However, it remains unclear which patients are likely responders and which may derive limited benefit. Objective: This study aimed to identify predictors of unfavorable therapeutic outcomes following this ‘ablate and pace’ therapy. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, consecutive patients with successful LBBAP and AVN ablation were included. Baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes were assessed. Multivariable Cox regression and reclassification analysis were used to evaluate the predictors of heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Results: Ninety-eight patients (age 73.1 ± 8.9 years; ventricular rate 93.6 ± 18.7 bpm; 41.8% male) were enrolled. During 43.9 ± 19.4 months of follow-up, 19 (19.4%) patients experienced HFH. Three independent risk factors were identified for HFH: impaired renal function (eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2; HR: 7.9), left atrial enlargement (LAD ≥ 50 mm; HR: 4.8), and male sex (HR: 3.9). A risk stratification model incorporating these factors effectively discriminated patients with minimal versus high HFH risk. All patients with three risk factors experienced HFH within 2 years, whereas none of the 25 patients without any risk factors experienced the endpoint during 113 patient years of follow-up. Conclusions: The eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, LAD ≥ 50 mm, and male sex were likely predictors of poor therapeutic outcomes to ‘ablate and pace’ therapy in patients with AF and HF. Patients without any of these risk factors had minimal HFH risk, whereas ≥2 risk factors showed a markedly higher risk. This may help to identify potential patients who are less likely to benefit from this combined approach, although prospective validation is needed before clinical application.Keywords
Funding Information
- Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (2024ZD0521900)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (82200347)
- Central Universities Fundamental Research Grant of China (3332020092)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of left bundle branch pacing on right ventricular function: A 3-dimensional echocardiography studyHeart Rhythm, 2023
- His-bundle pacing and atrioventricular nodal ablation for noncontrolled atrial arrhythmia: A technical challenge with major clinical benefitsHeart Rhythm, 2022
- Conduction system pacing versus conventional pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation: Nonrandomized, on-treatment comparisonHeart Rhythm O2, 2022
- Atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with conduction system pacing leads: A comparison of His-bundle vs left bundle branch area pacing leadsHeart Rhythm, 2022
- Sex-Specific Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality Associated With Atrial Fibrillation in Heart FailureJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2021
- Impact of QRS Morphology on Response to Conduction System Pacing After Atrioventricular Junction AblationESC Heart Failure, 2021
- A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacingHeart Rhythm, 2019
- Right ventricular apical pacing–induced left ventricular dyssynchrony is associated with a subsequent decline in ejection fractionHeart Rhythm, 2014
- Reverse Remodeling of the Atria After Treatment of Chronic Stretch in HumansJACC, 2010
- Right Ventricular Pacing Can Induce Ventricular Dyssynchrony in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Atrioventricular Node AblationJACC, 2006