Ultrarapid Insulin Use Can Reduce Postprandial Hyperglycemia and Late Hypoglycemia, Even in Delayed Insulin Injections: A Connected Insulin Cap-Based Real-World Study
Authors:
- Fernando Gómez-PeraltaFGFernando Gómez-Peralta
- Xoan ValledorXVXoan Valledor
- Amanda López-PicadoALAmanda López-Picado
- Cristina AbreuCACristina Abreu
- Elsa Fernández-RubioEFElsa Fernández-Rubio
- Laura CotovadLCLaura Cotovad
- Pedro PujantePPPedro Pujante
- Elena García-FernándezEGElena García-Fernández
- Sharona AzrielSASharona Azriel
- Rosa CorcoyRCRosa Corcoy
- Jesús Pérez-GonzálezJPJesús Pérez-González
- Luis Ruiz-ValdepeñasLRLuis Ruiz-Valdepeñas
- 5 January 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 26 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Objectives: Reaching optimal postprandial glucose dynamics is a daily challenge for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This study aimed to analyze the postprandial hyperglycemic excursion (PHEs) and late postprandial hypoglycemia (LPH) risk according to prandial insulin time and type. Research Design and Methods: Real-world, retrospective study in T1D using multiple daily injections (MDI) analyzing 5 h of paired continuous glucose monitoring and insulin injections data collected from the connected cap Insulclock ® . Meal events were identified using the rate of change detection methodology. Postprandial glucometrics and LPH (glucose ® (URI), use. Results: Meal glycemic excursions ( n = 2488), RI: 1211, 48.7%; UR: 1277, 51.3%, in 82 people were analyzed according to injection time around the PHE: −45 to −15 min; −15 to 0 min; and 0 to +45 min. In 63% of the meals, insulin was injected after the PHE started. Lower PHE was observed with URI versus RI (glucose peak-baseline; mg/dL; mean ± standard deviation): 106.7 ± 35.2 versus 111.2 ± 40.3 ( P = 0.003), particularly in 0/+45 injections: 111.6 ± 40.2 versus 118.1 ± 43.3; ( P = 0.002). One third (29.1%) of participants added a second (correction) injection. The use of URI and avoiding a second injection were independently associated with less LPH risk, even in delayed injections (0/+45), (−36%, odds ratio [OR] 0.641; confidence interval [CI]: 0.462–0.909; P = 0.012) and −56% (OR 0.641; CI: 0.462–0.909 P = 0.038), respectively. Conclusions: URI analog use as prandial insulin reduces postprandial hyper- and hypoglycemia, even in delayed injections.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Glycaemic control and antidiabetic treatment trends in primary care centres in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus during 2007–2013 in Catalonia: a population-based studyBMJ Open, 2016
- Fear of hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes: impact of therapeutic advances and strategies for prevention - a reviewJournal of Diabetes and its Complications, 2016
- Incorrect Insulin Administration: A Problem That Warrants AttentionClinical Diabetes, 2016
- Time Delay of CGM SensorsJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2015
- Design of the Glucose Rate Increase DetectorJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2014
- The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rapid‐acting insulin analogues and their clinical consequencesDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2012
- Insulin Therapy and HypoglycemiaEndocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, 2012
- Timing of Meal Insulin Boluses to Achieve Optimal Postprandial Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 DiabetesDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2010
- Oscillating Glucose Is More Deleterious to Endothelial Function and Oxidative Stress Than Mean Glucose in Normal and Type 2 Diabetic PatientsDiabetes, 2008
- A Systematic Review of Adherence With Medications for DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2004