Modifiable methodological and reporting practices are associated with reproducibility of health sciences research: a systematic review and evidence and gap map

This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:

• Assessment of reporting practices and reproducibility potential of a cohort of published studies in computational knee biomechanics
  Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2022
• Reproducibility in the absence of selective reporting: An illustration from large‐scale brain asymmetry research
  Human Brain Mapping, 2020
• 1027: Does lowering the p-value threshold render RCTs insignificant in leading OBGYN journals?
  American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020
• Feasibility of Using Real-World Data to Replicate Clinical Trial Evidence
  JAMA Network Open, 2019
• Reproducibility of R‐fMRI metrics on the impact of different strategies for multiple comparison correction and sample sizes
  Human Brain Mapping, 2017
• Limitations of empirical calibration of p‐values using observational data
  Statistics in Medicine, 2016
• Multiplicity and replicability: two sides of the same coin
  Pharmaceutical Statistics, 2014
• SNP characteristics predict replication success in association studies
  Human Genetics, 2014
• Interpreting observational studies: why empirical calibration is needed to correct p‐values
  Statistics in Medicine, 2013
• Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research
  JAMA, 2005