Comparing Sentencing Decision Support Systems for Judges and Lawyers
Authors:
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Decision Systems
- Vol. 17 (4)
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Split-up project: induction, context and knowledge discovery in lawLaw, Probability and Risk, 2004
- Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoningThe Knowledge Engineering Review, 2001
- Statistical information systems as a means to consistency and rationality in sentencingInternational Journal of Law and Information Technology, 1999
- COMPUTERIZED DECISION TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIAL SERVICE: DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM IMPROVES DECISION PRACTICE IN YOUTH PROBATION SERVICEInternational Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 1990
- DESCRIPTIVE, NORMATIVE, AND PRESCRIPTIVE INTERACTIONS IN DECISION MAKING1988
- Behavioral Decision TheoryAnnual Review of Psychology, 1977
- Choice between equally valued alternatives.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974
- Problem DepartmentSchool Science and Mathematics, 1974
- Rational choice and the structure of the environment.Psychological Review, 1956