Candidates' Ability to Identify Criteria in Nontransparent Selection Procedures: Evidence from an assessment center and a structured interview
Authors:
- C.J. KönigCKC.J. König
- Cornelius J.CJCornelius J.
- Klaus G. MelchersKMKlaus G. Melchers
- Martin KleinmannMKMartin Kleinmann
- Gerald M. RichterGRGerald M. Richter
- Ute‐Christine KleheUKUte‐Christine Klehe
- 14 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Selection and Assessment
- Vol. 15 (3) , 283-292
Abstract
In selection procedures like assessment centers (ACs) and structured interviews, candidates are often not informed about the targeted criteria. Previous studies have shown that candidates' ability to identify these criteria (ATIC) is related to their performance in the respective selection procedure. However, past research has studied ATIC in only one selection procedure at a time, even though it has been assumed that ATIC is consistent across situations, which is a prerequisite for ATIC to contribute to selection procedures' criterion‐related validity. In this study, 95 candidates participated in an AC and a structured interview. ATIC scores showed cross‐situational consistency across the two procedures and accounted for part of the relationship between performance in the selection procedures. Furthermore, ATIC scores in one procedure predicted performance in the other procedure even after controlling for cognitive ability. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measuresJournal of Research in Personality, 2006
- The Impact of Job Complexity and Study Design on Situational and Behavior Description Interview ValidityInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2004
- Perspectives on fluid and crystallized intelligence: facets for verbal, numerical, and figural intelligencePersonality and Individual Differences, 2001
- The Effects of Social Desirability and Faking on Personality and Integrity Assessment for Personnel SelectionHuman Performance, 1998
- Transparency: A Necessary Requirement for the Construct Validity of Assessment CentresApplied Psychology, 1996
- Correlations redux.Psychological Bulletin, 1995
- Are rating dimensions in assessment centers transparent for participants? Consequences for criterion and construct validity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993
- Meta-analysis of assessment center validity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- Meta-analysis of assessment center validity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- A preference mapping of organizational objectives of sports franchise executives.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980