Emotional disorders among informal caregivers in the general population: target groups for prevention
Open Access
- 15 February 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Psychiatry
- Vol. 15 (1) , 23
Abstract
There are indications that informal caregiving negatively impacts caregivers’ mental health, but this was hardly examined using diagnoses of mental disorders and most studies used convenience samples without including non-caregivers as reference group. We examine whether informal caregivers more often have any emotional disorder, i.e. mood or anxiety disorder, than non-caregivers. Identify key risk indicators for any emotional disorder among informal caregivers in the general population. Data were used from the second wave of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2), a nationally representative face-to-face survey (n = 5,303; aged 21–68). Respondents were defined as informal caregiver when they provided unpaid care in the 12 months preceding the second wave to a family member, partner or friend who needed care because of physical or mental problems, or ageing. Twelve-month DSM-IV diagnoses of emotional disorders were assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0. Key risk indicators were identified using the following aspects: prevalence, odds ratio, attributable risk proportion, and number needed to treat. Sociodemographic, caregiving-related and other characteristics were considered as risk indicators. In the past year, 31.1% of the respondents provided informal care, which ranged in time spent (8 or more hours/week: 32.1%) and duration (longer than 1 year: 48.7%). Informal caregiving was not associated with having any 12-month emotional disorder. Among caregivers, giving care to a first-degree relative, partner or close friend and giving emotional support increased the risk for any emotional disorder. Moreover, using all aspects, target groups were identified for prevention: caregivers without a job, living without a partner, and with a lack of social support. Although informal caregivers do not have an increased risk of emotional disorders, key risk indicators were identified using four aspects. Especially informal caregivers with limited resources (unemployment, living without a partner, lack of social support) may benefit from targeted prevention whereas general prevention measures may be desirable for carers with a burdensome care situation (giving care to a close loved one or providing emotional support).Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- The association between common mental disorders and violence: to what extent is it influenced by prior victimization, negative life events and low levels of social support?Psychological Medicine, 2013
- Caregiving for Parents and In-Laws: Commonalities and DifferencesJournal of Gerontological Social Work, 2013
- Cross-national differences in the prevalence and correlates of burden among older family caregivers in the World Health Organization World Mental Health (WMH) SurveysPsychological Medicine, 2012
- The Outlook for Population GrowthScience, 2011
- Ageing populations: the challenges aheadThe Lancet, 2009
- Changes in social support and their impact on psychosocial outcome over a 5‐year period for African American and White dementia caregiversInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2008
- Effectiveness of a Web-Based Self-Help Intervention for Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress: Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2008
- The Burden of Schizophrenia on CaregiversPharmacoEconomics, 2008
- Informal CaregivingMedical Care, 2002
- Gain in the Caregiving Experience: Where Are We? What Next?The Gerontologist, 1997