Diffusion‐weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients
Authors:
- 13 November 2008
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in NMR in Biomedicine
- Vol. 22 (3) , 318-325
Abstract
This study compares parameters from monoexponential and biexponential modelling of diffusion‐weighted imaging of normal and malignant prostate tissue and normal rectal wall tissues. Fifty men with Stage Ic prostate cancer were studied using endorectal T2‐weighted imaging and diffusion‐weighted imaging with 11 diffusion‐sensitive values (b‐values = 0, 1, 2, 4, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 s/mm2). Regions of interest were drawn within non‐malignant central gland and peripheral zone, malignant prostate tissue and normal rectal wall tissue. Both a monoexponential and biexponential model was fitted over various b‐value ranges, giving an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from the monoexponential model and a diffusion coefficient, perfusion coefficient and perfusion fraction from the biexponential model. In all tissues, over the full range of b‐values, the ADC from the monoexponential model was significantly higher than the corresponding diffusion coefficient from the biexponential model. As the minimum b‐value increased, the ADC decreased and was equal to the diffusion coefficient for some b‐value ranges. The biexponential model best described the data when low b‐values were included, suggesting that there is a fast perfusion component. Neither model could distinguish between benign prostate tissues on the basis of diffusion coefficients, but the rectal wall tissue and malignant prostate tissue had significantly lower diffusion coefficients than normal prostate tissues. Perfusion coefficients and fractions were highly variable within the population, so their clinical utility may be limited, but removal of this variable perfusion component from reported diffusion coefficients is important when attributing clinical differences to diffusion within tissues. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detectionActa Radiologica, 2007
- Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: the value of apparent diffusion coefficients for identifying malignant nodulesBritish Journal of Radiology, 2007
- Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor rangeMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 2006
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate CancerJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2005
- Endorectal diffusion‐weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2004
- Phased-array Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate with Correlation to Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Local ExperienceAsian Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Endorectal MRI for prediction of tumor site, tumor size, and local extension of prostate cancerUrology, 2004
- Evidence that both fast and slow water ADC components arise from intracellular spaceMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2002
- Multi-component apparent diffusion coefficients in human brainNMR in Biomedicine, 1999
- Does IVIM measure classical perfusion?Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1990