The continuing search for a better mouse trap: Two tests of a practical, low-cost camera trap for detecting and observing small mammals
Authors:
Open Access
- 7 January 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 20 (1) , e0309252
Abstract
The advent of digital wildlife cameras has led to a dramatic increase in the use of camera traps for mammalian biodiversity surveys, ecological studies and occupancy analyses. For cryptic mammals such as mice and shrews, whose small sizes pose many challenges for unconstrained digital photography, use of camera traps remains relatively infrequent. Here we use a practical, low-cost small mammal camera platform (the “MouseCam”) that is easy and inexpensive to fabricate and deploy and requires little maintenance beyond camera service. We tested the MouseCam in two applications: a study of small mammal species composition on two transects across a barrier island and a study of small mammal occupancy along a subtle elevation gradient in a mainland forest. The MouseCam was reasonably efficient, with over 78% of all images containing a recognizable small mammal (mouse, vole, rat or shrew). We obtained an accurate estimate of species composition on the island transects, as indicated by comparison with both concurrent and long-term trapping records for the same transects. MouseCams required a smaller expenditure of personnel and transportation resources than would be required for live trapping. They also detected subtle elevation-related differences in species occupancy in the mainland forest for the marsh rice rat, with the species occurring at lower elevations in the forest. This is consistent with the typical occurrence of the marsh rice rat in marshes and wetlands. We also tested devices (barriers, runways) designed to reduce disturbance by mesopredators (e.g., raccoons). Adding an internal barrier to the MouseCam did not reduce use by white-footed mice, whereas adding an external runway did. We believe specialized small mammal camera-based sensors may have wide applicability in field studies of small mammal distribution, abundance and biology.Keywords
Funding Information
- Division of Environmental Biology (1832221)
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diet composition analysis provides new management insights for a highly specialized endangered small mammalPLOS ONE, 2020
- Abundance estimation of unmarked animals based on camera‐trap dataConservation Biology, 2020
- Snap happy: camera traps are an effective sampling tool when compared with alternative methodsRoyal Society Open Science, 2019
- Estimating the intensity of use by interacting predators and prey using camera trapsJournal of Animal Ecology, 2019
- An improved camera trap for amphibians, reptiles, small mammals, and large invertebratesPLOS ONE, 2017
- 2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education:Journal of Mammalogy, 2016
- Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: A practitioner’s perspectiveAMBIO, 2015
- Camera Trapping: A Contemporary Approach to Monitoring Invasive Rodents in High Conservation Priority EcosystemsPLOS ONE, 2014
- Rats and mice share common ethologically relevant parameters of exploratory behaviorBehavioural Brain Research, 2001
- Experiments on neophobia in wild and laboratory rats: A reevaluation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1976