Low Perceived Self-Efficacy Impedes Discriminative Fear Learning
Authors:
Open Access
- 18 June 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychology
- Vol. 10, 1191
Abstract
Perceived self-efficacy refers to a subject’s expectation about the outcomes his/her behavior will have in a challenging situation. Low self-efficacy has been implicated in the origins and maintenance of phobic behavior. Correlational studies suggest an association between perceived self-efficacy and learning. The experimental manipulation of perceived self-efficacy offers an interesting approach to examine the impact of self-efficacy beliefs on cognitive and emotional functions. Recently, a positive effect of an experimentally induced increased self-efficacy on associative learning has been demonstrated. Changes in associative learning constitute a central hallmark of pathological fear and anxiety. Such alterations in the acquisition and extinction of conditioned fear may be related to cognitive and neurobiological factors that predict a certain vulnerability to anxiety disorders. The present study builds on previous own work by investigating the effect of an experimentally induced low perceived self-efficacy on fear acquisition, extinction and extinction retrieval in a differential fear conditioning task. Our results suggest that a negative verbal feedback, which leads to a decreased self-efficacy, is associated with changes in the acquisition of conditioned fear. During fear acquisition, the negative verbal feedback group showed decreased discrimination of fear responses between the aversive and safe conditioned stimuli (CS) relative to a group receiving a neutral feedback. The effects of the negative verbal feedback on the acquisition of fear discrimination learning were indexed by an impaired ability to discriminate the probability of receiving a shock during acquisition upon presentation of the aversive (CS+) relative to the safe stimuli (CS−). However, the effects of low self-efficacy on discrimination learning were limited to fear acquisition. No differences between the groups were observed during extinction and extinction retrieval. Furthermore, analysis of other outcome measures, i.e., skin conductance responses and CS valence ratings, revealed no group differences during the different phases of fear conditioning. In conclusion, lower perceived self-efficacy alters cognitive/expectancy components of discrimination during fear learning but not evaluative components and physiological responding. The pattern of findings suggests a selective, detrimental role of low(er) self-efficacy on the subject’s ability to learn the association between ambiguous cues and threat/safety.Keywords
Funding Information
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human Fear Acquisition Deficits in Relation to Genetic Variants of the Corticotropin Releasing Hormone Receptor 1 and the Serotonin TransporterPLOS ONE, 2013
- The impact of perceived self-efficacy on memory for aversive experiencesMemory, 2012
- Social anxiety and related social impairment are linked to self-efficacy and dysfunctional copingScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2010
- Emotion Regulation Questionnaire – Eine deutschsprachige Fassung des ERQ von Gross und JohnDiagnostica, 2009
- Impaired discriminative fear-conditioning resulting from elevated fear responding to learned safety cues among individuals with panic disorderBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2009
- Prediction of “Fear” Acquisition in Healthy Control Participants in a De Novo Fear-Conditioning ParadigmBehavior Modification, 2007
- Self-Efficacy for Social Situations in Adolescents with Generalized Social Anxiety DisorderBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2006
- The Relative Contributions of Negative Cognitions and Self-efficacy to Severity of Panic Attacks in Panic DisorderBehaviour Change, 2002
- Self-efficacy conception of anxietyAnxiety Research, 1988
- Guided mastery and performance desensitization treatments for severe acrophobia.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1985