Color Mapping of Teeth Restored Using Dental Adhesives Loaded with Magnetic Nanoparticles
Authors:
- Carina-Sonia NeaguCNCarina-Sonia Neagu
- Robert-Angelo TuceRTRobert-Angelo Tuce
- Rodica TurcuRTRodica Turcu
- Izabell CraciunescuICIzabell Craciunescu
- Vlad Mircea SocoliucVSVlad Mircea Socoliuc
- Roxana-Maria Talpos-NiculescuRTRoxana-Maria Talpos-Niculescu
- Luminita-Maria NicaLNLuminita-Maria Nica
- Virgil-Florin DumaVirgil-Florin Duma
- Cosmin SinescuCosmin Sinescu
Open Access
- 1 June 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Dentistry Journal
- Vol. 14 (6) , 333
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Conventional dental adhesives doped with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) hold the promise of preventing microleakages. However, esthetic concerns have motivated the quest for coatings capable of masking the dark color of MNPs. This study aims to quantify regional chromatic differences between teeth restored using dental adhesives with different MNP content. Materials and Methods: We prepared cavities in 42 artificial molars and 9 extracted teeth and divided them into 6 groups: Group 0 (G0), G1, and G2, comprising 14 artificial teeth each and G0e, G1e, and G2e, comprising 3 extracted teeth each. In G0 and G0e, we applied the commercial adhesive, in G1 and G1e we applied the adhesive loaded with MNPs with dual coating (SiO2 followed by Ca(OH)2), whereas in G2 and G2e we applied the adhesive doped with uncoated MNPs. For the statistical analysis of color differences, we employed Bland–Altman plots and the one-sample t-test. Results: G1 was similar to G0 in terms of color coordinate distribution, whereas G2 was different. Compared to G0, dental fillings from G1 had mean differences of (−0.56, 0.18, −0.07) in the CIELAB color coordinates (L*, a*, b*), respectively, whereas the mean differences between G2 and G0 were (−15.6, −3.5, −15.7). The CIEDE2000 color differences were 1.5 [1.3, 1.6] between G1 and G0 (mean [95% confidence interval]) and 17.0 [16.0, 18.0] between G2 and G0. Nevertheless, 24.4% of the point pairs compared exceeded the acceptability limit for color difference (1.8). Conclusions: Although the silica and calcium hydroxide coating is highly effective in alleviating the esthetic impact of MNP-laden dental adhesives, further research is warranted to reduce between-specimen variability.Keywords
Funding Information
- “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara (13570/01.10.2020)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnetic nanoparticles as promising materials for the future of medicineJournal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2026
- A novel approach for the replacement of accuracy and precision measurements with the visual instrument agreement scale (VIAS) in evaluating the performance of four intraoral scanners and one shade measurement deviceJournal of Dentistry, 2024
- Bridging instrumental and visual perception with improved color difference equations: A multi-center studyDental Materials, 2024
- Magnetic nanoparticles: A novel adjunct for dentistryMaterials Today: Proceedings, 2022
- Magnetic motion of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles- loaded dental adhesives: physicochemical/biological properties, and dentin bonding performance studied through the tooth pulpal pressure modelActa Biomaterialia, 2021
- Novel magnetic nanoparticle-containing adhesive with greater dentin bond strength and antibacterial and remineralizing capabilitiesDental Materials, 2018
- Color difference thresholds in dental ceramicsJournal of Dentistry, 2010
- The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: Implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observationsColor Research & Application, 2004
- Effects of blood contamination on the shear bond strengths of conventional and hydrophilic primersAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2004
- The development of the CIE 2000 colour‐difference formula: CIEDE2000Color Research & Application, 2001