Unequal Detection of HIV Type 1 Group O Infection by Simple Rapid Tests

Authors:

Abstract
To the Editor—Given our particular involvement in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening with simple rapid tests (SRTs) in developing countries, we read with great interest the articles by Novitsky et al. [1] and Corcoran et al. [2] in Clinical Infectious Diseases. Each of them reported a case of antibody-negative HIV type 1 (HIV-1) subtype C infection (in Botswana and South Africa, respectively). Cameroon is another African country where HIV-1 is characterized by extensive genetic variability, with the existence of the most-divergent HIV-1 strains, HIV-1 group O and group N [3, 4]. Recently, Determine HIV-1/2 (Inverness Medical Innovations) and Immunocomb II HIV-1/2 bispot (Orgenics) tests used in Cameroon for the 2-SRT HIV screening strategy were replaced by Retrocheck HIV-WB (Qualpro Diagnostics) and SD Bioline HIV-1/2 3.0 (Standard Diagnostics). These new tests had been evaluated by 2 studies, in the Central African Republic and South India, and demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity (100% and 98.0%, respectively, for Retrocheck HIV-WB and 100% and 99.4%, respectively, for SD Bioline HIV-1/2 3.0) [5, 6]. Nevertheless, we noted that no serum sample had been serotyped as indicating HIV-1 group O infection in these studies.