Source dependence in the valuation of objects
Authors:
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
- Vol. 7 (3) , 157-168
Abstract
We ran two experiments to test whether people value objects more highly when they obtain those objects due to exemplary performance at a task. In the first, subjects who believed they had obtained a prize due to their performance on a classroom exercise valued it more highly than those who believed they had obtained it by chance. In the second, subjects who obtained a prize due to exemplary performance on a task valued it more highly than those who obtained it due to their poor performance. In both experiments, this ‘source dependence’ effect is approximately equal in strength to the endowment effect, which compares the valuation of subjects with and without the prize. We suggest a possible explanation for this source‐dependence effect based on associationism, and rule out two alternative explanations.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mental accounting and categorizationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992
- Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertaintyJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1991
- Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase TheoremJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- The Cognitive Structure of Emotions1988
- A perspective on disgust.Psychological Review, 1987
- Credit Cards as Spending Facilitating Stimuli: A Conditioning InterpretationJournal of Consumer Research, 1986
- Early development of association theory in psychology as a forerunner to connection theoryBrain and Cognition, 1984
- Egocentric biases in availability and attribution.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Weapons as aggression-eliciting stimuli.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967
- Valence of outcome and expectation of success in relation to task difficulty and perceived locus of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967