Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15
Authors:
- Rhiju DasRDRhiju Das
- Rachael C. KretschRKRachael C. Kretsch
- Adam J. SimpkinASAdam J. Simpkin
- Thomas MulvaneyTMThomas Mulvaney
- Phillip PhamPPPhillip Pham
- Ramya RanganRRRamya Rangan
- Fan BuFBFan Bu
- Ronan M. KeeganRKRonan M. Keegan
- Maya TopfMTMaya Topf
- Daniel J. RigdenDRDaniel J. Rigden
- Zhichao MiaoZhichao Miao
- Eric WesthofEWEric Westhof
Preprint
Abstract
The prediction of RNA three-dimensional structures remains an unsolved problem. Here, we report assessments of RNA structure predictions in CASP15, the first CASP exercise that involved RNA structure modeling. Forty two predictor groups submitted models for at least one of twelve RNA-containing targets. These models were evaluated by the RNA-Puzzles organizers and, separately, by a CASP-recruited team using metrics (GDT, lDDT) and approaches (Z-score rankings) initially developed for assessment of proteins and generalized here for RNA assessment. The two assessments independently ranked the same predictor groups as first (AIchemy_RNA2), second (Chen), and third (RNAPolis and GeneSilico, tied); predictions from deep learning approaches were significantly worse than these top ranked groups, which did not use deep learning. Further analyses based on direct comparison of predicted models to cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps and X-ray diffraction data support these rankings. With the exception of two RNA-protein complexes, models submitted by CASP15 groups correctly predicted the global fold of the RNA targets. Comparisons of CASP15 submissions to designed RNA nanostructures as well as molecular replacement trials highlight the potential utility of current RNA modeling approaches for RNA nanotechnology and structural biology, respectively. Nevertheless, challenges remain in modeling fine details such as non- canonical pairs, in ranking among submitted models, and in prediction of multiple structures resolved by cryo-EM or crystallography.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 91 (12), 1747.
This publication has 81 references indexed in Scilit:
- lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference testsBioinformatics, 2013
- RNA-Puzzles: A CASP-like evaluation of RNA three-dimensional structure predictionRNA, 2012
- Comparison of a PreQ1 Riboswitch Aptamer in Metabolite-bound and Free States with Implications for Gene RegulationJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2011
- REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structuresActa Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology, 2011
- Overview of theCCP4 suite and current developmentsActa Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology, 2011
- OpenStructure: a flexible software framework for computational structural biologyBioinformatics, 2010
- New metrics for comparing and assessing discrepancies between RNA 3D structures and modelsRNA, 2009
- Phasercrystallographic softwareJournal of Applied Crystallography, 2007
- MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acidsNucleic Acids Research, 2007
- THESEUS: maximum likelihood superpositioning and analysis of macromolecular structuresBioinformatics, 2006