A Clinical Trial of Active Management of Labor
Authors:
- Ellice LiebermanELEllice Lieberman
- Janet M. LangJLJanet M. Lang
- Amy CohenACAmy Cohen
- Vanessa BarssVBVanessa Barss
- Steven RingerSRSteven Ringer
- Sanjay DattaSDSanjay Datta
- 21 September 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 333 (12) , 745-750
Abstract
Active management of labor is a multifaceted program that, as implemented at the National Maternity Hospital in Dublin, is associated with a lower rate of cesarean delivery than the rate usually found in the United States. We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of this approach in lowering the rate of cesarean section among women delivering their first babies. Methods We randomly assigned 1934 nulliparous women at low risk of complications of pregnancy, before 30 weeks' gestation, to active management of labor or to a usual-care group. The components of active management were customized childbirth classes; strict criteria for the diagnosis of labor; standardized management of labor, including early amniotomy and treatment with high-dose oxytocin; and one-to-one nursing. A low-risk subgroup was defined as including women with full-term, uncomplicated pregnancies who spontaneously went into labor (the protocol-eligible subgroup). Women meeting these criteria who had been randomly assigned to the active-management group were admitted to a separate unit where their labor was managed by trained, certified nurse-midwives. Results There was no difference between groups in the rate of cesarean section either among all women (active management, 19.5 percent; usual care, 19.4 percent) or in the protocol-eligible subgroup (active management, 10.9 percent; usual care, 11.5 percent). In the protocol-eligible subgroup, the median duration of labor was shortened by 2.7 hours by active management (from 8.9 to 6.2 hours), and the rate of maternal fever was lower (7 percent vs. 11 percent, P = 0.007). The percentage of women in whom labor lasted longer than 12 hours was three times higher in the usual-care group than in the active-management group (26 percent vs. 9 percent, P<0.001). Conclusions Active management of labor did not reduce the rate of cesarean section in nulliparous women but was associated with a somewhat shorter duration of labor and less maternal fever.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Controlled Trial of a Program for the Active Management of LaborNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Cesarean section: The House of Home revisitedAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- Active management of labor and operative delivery in nulliparous womenAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- Cesarean section: An answer to the House of HorneAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985