UK recommendations for Ki‐67 immunohistochemical staining and interpretation in breast cancer
Authors:
- Abeer M ShaabanAbeer M Shaaban
- Andrew DodsonADAndrew Dodson
- Emad RakhaEREmad Rakha
- Ian EllisIEIan Ellis
- Daniel ReaDRDaniel Rea
- Cecily QuinnCQCecily Quinn
- Elena ProvenzanoEPElena Provenzano
- Sarah PinderSPSarah Pinder
- the UK National Coordinating Committee for Breast Pathology (NCCBP), Association of Breast Pathology (ABP) and the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Hybridisation (UK NEQAS ICC & ISH)TIthe UK National Coordinating Committee for Breast Pathology (NCCBP), Association of Breast Pathology (ABP) and the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Hybridisation (UK NEQAS ICC & ISH)
Open Access
- 18 July 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Histopathology
Abstract
Ki‐67 is a well‐established marker of tumour proliferation and an important prognostic and predictive biomarker in breast cancer, particularly in hormone receptor–positive (HR‐positive), HER2‐negative disease. Despite its biological relevance, clinical implementation has been limited by the reported interobserver and interlaboratory variability. Recent therapeutic advances have created an increased need for accurate and reproducible Ki‐67 assessment in clinical practice. This review summarizes the biological basis for the use of Ki‐67 as a marker of proliferation, technical requirements for reliable immunohistochemistry and the influence of pre‐analytical and analytical variables on staining performance. We evaluate established and emerging scoring approaches and provide scoring recommendations for practising pathologists. A simplified calibrated global assessment method is presented as an alternative to exhaustive visual quantification that preserves its accuracy while substantially reducing scoring time and avoiding the variability of estimated methods. Image analysis/artificial intelligence (AI) using validated algorithms is recommended where available. We also review the role of Ki‐67 in predicting response to neoadjuvant endocrine and chemotherapy, its integration into prognostic models such as the PEPI score, and its utility in selecting patients for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibition. The limitations of fixed cut‐off values are discussed, together with the potential advantages of tiered classification and continuous modelling. Finally, we outline the growing role of digital pathology and AI, which have demonstrated improved reproducibility, reduced turnaround time, and prognostic performance superior to manual scoring. Ki‐67 is a clinically meaningful biomarker, the value of which can only be fully realized through rigorous standardization, validated scoring approaches and close communication between pathologists and oncologists. This guidance provides a practical framework for high‐quality Ki‐67 assessment and supports its safe and effective integration into contemporary breast cancer management.Keywords
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inter‐rater agreement of HER2 ‐low scores between expert breast pathologists and the Visiopharm digital image analysis application ( HER2 APP , CE2797 )The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research, 2025
- AI‐based intra‐tumor heterogeneity score of Ki67 expression as a prognostic marker for early‐stage ER+/HER2− breast cancerThe Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research, 2023
- Ki-67, 21-Gene Recurrence Score, Endocrine Resistance, and Survival in Patients With Breast CancerJAMA Network Open, 2023
- Ki‐67 index, progesterone receptor expression, histologic grade and tumor size in predicting breast cancer recurrence risk: A consecutive cohort studyCancer Communications, 2020
- Quality assessment of Ki67 staining using cell line proliferation index and stain intensity featuresCytometry Part A, 2018
- Prognostic value of different cut-off levels of Ki-67 in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64,196 patientsBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2015
- Relationship between oestrogen receptor status and proliferation in predicting response and long-term outcome to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2009
- A graphical method to assess treatment-covariate interactions using the Cox model on subsets of the dataStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- The Ki-67 protein: From the known and the unknownJournal of Cellular Physiology, 2000
- Monoclonal antibodies against recombinant parts of the Ki‐67 antigen (MIB 1 and MIB 3) detect proliferating cells in microwave‐processed formalin‐fixed paraffin sectionsThe Journal of Pathology, 1992