Impact of adding therapeutic recommendations to risk assessments from a prediction model for postoperative nausea and vomiting
Open Access
- 1 October 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Vol. 114 (2) , 252-260
Abstract
In a large cluster-randomized trial on the impact of a prediction model, presenting the calculated risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) on-screen (assistive approach) increased the administration of risk-dependent PONV prophylaxis by anaesthetists. This change in therapeutic decision-making did not improve the patient outcome; that is, the incidence of PONV. The present study aimed to quantify the effects of adding a specific therapeutic recommendation to the predicted risk (directive approach) on PONV prophylaxis decision-making and the incidence of PONV. A prospective before–after study was conducted in 1483 elective surgical inpatients. The before-period included care-as-usual and the after-period included the directive risk-based (intervention) strategy. Risk-dependent effects on the administered number of prophylactic antiemetics and incidence of PONV were analysed by mixed-effects regression analysis. During the intervention period anaesthetists administered 0.5 [95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.4–0.6] more antiemetics for patients identified as being at greater risk of PONV. This directive approach led to a reduction in PONV [odds ratio (OR): 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43–0.83], with an even greater reduction in PONV in high-risk patients (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28–0.72). Anaesthetists administered more prophylactic antiemetics when a directive approach was used for risk-tailored intervention compared with care-as-usual. In contrast to the previously studied assistive approach, the increase in PONV prophylaxis now resulted in a lower PONV incidence, particularly in high-risk patients. When one aims for a truly ‘PONV-free hospital’, a more liberal use of prophylactic antiemetics must be accepted and lower-risk thresholds should be set for the actionable recommendations.Keywords
Funding Information
- The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (945.16.202; 912.08.004; 918.10.615)
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model ResearchPLOS Medicine, 2013
- Adaptation of Clinical Prediction Models for Application in Local SettingsMedical Decision Making, 2012
- Selection of confounding variables should not be based on observed associations with exposureEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findingsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- Risk scores for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting are clinically useful tools and should be used in every patient: Pro – ‘Donʼt throw the baby out with the bathwater’European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2011
- Risk scores for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting are clinically useful tools and should be used in every patient: Con – ‘life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated’European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2011
- Ongoing Provision of Individual Clinician Performance Data Improves Practice BehaviorAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2010
- Review: A gentle introduction to imputation of missing valuesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to successBMJ, 2005
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999