Is Sacral Nerve Stimulation an Effective Treatment for Chronic Idiopathic Anal Pain?
Authors:
- Ezio FallettoEzio Falletto
- Alessandra MasinAMAlessandra Masin
- Paola LolliPLPaola Lolli
- Roberto VillaniRVRoberto Villani
- Ezio GanioEGEzio Ganio
- Valter RipettiValter Ripetti
- Aldo InfantinoAIAldo Infantino
- Alessandro StaziASAlessandro Stazi
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 52 (3) , 456-462
Abstract
Chronic idiopathic anal pain is a common, benign symptom, the etiology of which remains unclear. Traditional treatments are often ineffective. This study investigated the efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation in treating chronic idiopathic anal pain. Twelve patients (10 women and 2 men; mean age, 61.0 ± 10.3 years; range, 48-82 years) implanted with a permanent device for sacral nerve stimulation were followed in the Italian Group for Sacral Neuromodulation (GINS) Registry. All patients had frequent chronic anal or perianal pain; 75 percent had previously undergone pelvic surgery. Pharmacologic and rehabilitative therapy had yielded poor results. Changes from baseline to last follow-up examination were evaluated for scores on a visual analog pain scale (0-10) and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) health status questionnaire. Manometric measurements recordered at last follow-up were compared with preimplantation values. In one patient, the permanent device was removed because of technical failure. After a mean follow-up of 15 (range, 3-80) months, visual analog pain scores had significantly improved (from 8.2 ± 1.7 to 2.2 ± 1.3, P < 0.001). SF-36 physical component scores increased from 26.27 ± 5.65 to 38.95 ± 9.08, P < 0.02). Scores on the mental component showed improvement, although not significant. Postimplantation changes in manometric functional data were not significant, but sensitivity thresholds showed a considerable decrease. Long-term follow-up data showing improvements in scores on the visual analog pain scale and quality of life questionnaire indicate that, before adopting more aggressive surgical procedures, SNS should be considered for patients with chronic idiopathic anal pain in whom pharmacologic and biofeedback treatments have failed to produce effective results.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO CONTROLLED, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY OF PELVIC ELECTROMAGNETIC THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN SYNDROME WITH 1 YEAR OF FOLLOWUPJournal of Urology, 2005
- Recognition and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome among women with chronic pelvic painAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005
- Chronic idiopathic anal painBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Principles of Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS) for the Treatment of Bladder and Urethral Sphincter DysfunctionsNeuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2000
- Recent Advances: Sacral Nerve Root Stimulation Using a Retrograde Method of Lead Insertion for the Treatment of Pelvic Pain due to Interstitial CystitisNeuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 1999
- Initial North American experience with botulinum toxin type a for treatment of anismusDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1996
- Anorectal function and morphology in patients with sporadic proctalgia fugaxDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1996
- Outpatient protocol for biofeedback therapy of pelvic floor outlet obstructionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1992
- Levator syndromeDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1985
- Convergence of cutaneous and pelvic visceral nociceptive inputs onto primate spinothalamic neuronsPain, 1981