Determiner removal in Balinese nonpivot agents
Authors:
Open Access
Abstract
Patient‐voice clauses within the symmetric voice system of Balinese disallow any extraction from the external‐argument position, while definite external arguments are blocked from occurring altogether. The former fact is traditionally taken as evidence for syntactic ergativity in Austronesian. The latter fact has recently been argued to provide evidence for postsyntactic case licensing via adjacency with the verb. In this article, we offer a simple alternative explanation for the in‐situ properties of patient‐voice agents in Balinese—one that does not make reference to case. We argue that patient‐voice heads come with a feature that triggers removal of the external argument's DP shell, resulting in the loss of a determiner and a category‐D feature that would otherwise enable extraction.Keywords
Funding Information
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Hans Böckler Stiftung
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ergativity, accusativity, and the order of Merge and Agree2009
- Incorporating agentsLingua, 2009
- Phase Edge and Extraction: A Tagalog Case StudyLinguistic Inquiry, 2005
- The Malagasy Subject/Topic as an A′-ElementNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 2005
- Decomposing PronounsLinguistic Inquiry, 2002
- Movement Operations after SyntaxLinguistic Inquiry, 2001
- Quantifier Float andWh-Movement in an Irish EnglishLinguistic Inquiry, 2000
- Severing the External Argument from its Verb1996
- On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreementNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1995
- Ergativity in AtayalOceanic Linguistics, 1994