Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in preterm newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized controlled trial
- 9 August 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Pediatrics
- Vol. 175 (9) , 1175-1183
Abstract
Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) improves patient-ventilator synchrony during invasive ventilation and leads to lower peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) and oxygen requirements. The aim of this trial was to compare NAVA with current standard ventilation in preterm infants in terms of the duration of invasive ventilation. Sixty infants born between 28 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation and requiring invasive ventilation due to neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) were randomized to conventional ventilation or NAVA. The median durations of invasive ventilation were 34.7 h (quartiles 22.8–67.9 h) and 25.8 h (15.6–52.1 h) in the NAVA and control groups, respectively (P = 0.21). Lower PIPs were achieved with NAVA (P = 0.02), and the rapid reduction in PIP after changing the ventilation mode to NAVA made following the predetermined extubation criteria challenging. The other ventilatory and vital parameters did not differ between the groups. Frequent apneas and persistent pulmonary hypertension were conditions that limited the use of NAVA in 17 % of the patients randomized to the NAVA group. Similar cumulative doses of opiates were used in both groups (P = 0.71). Conclusions: NAVA was a safe and feasible ventilation mode for the majority of preterm infants suffering from RDS, but the traditional extubation criteria were not clinically applicable during NAVA. What is known: • NAVA improves patient-ventilator synchrony during invasive ventilation. • Lower airway pressures and oxygen requirements are achieved with NAVA during invasive ventilation in preterm infants by comparison with conventional ventilation. What is new: • Infants suffering from PPHN did not tolerate NAVA in the acute phase of their illness. • The traditional extubation criteria relying on inspiratory pressures and spontaneous breathing efforts were not clinically applicable during NAVA.Keywords
Funding Information
- The Alma and K.A. Snellman Foundation, Oulu, Finland
- The Foundation for Pediatric Research, Finland
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimizing Patient-Ventilator Synchrony During Invasive Ventilator Assist in Children and Infants Remains a Difficult Task*Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2013
- Randomized Crossover Study of Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Preterm InfantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2012
- Current trends in paediatric and neonatal ventilatory care - a nationwide surveyActa Paediatrica, 2012
- Asynchrony, neural drive, ventilatory variability and COMFORT: NAVA versus pressure support in pediatric patients. A non-randomized cross-over trialIntensive Care Medicine, 2012
- Comparison of pressure‐, flow‐, and NAVA‐Triggering in pediatric and neonatal ventilatory carePediatric Pulmonology, 2011
- Lung-Protective Ventilation in NeonatologyNeonatology, 2011
- Ventilation Practices in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional StudyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2010
- Nasal CPAP or Intubation at Birth for Very Preterm InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Changing incidence and outcome of infants with respiratory distress syndrome in the 1990s: a population‐based surveyActa Paediatrica, 2004
- Characterisation of the Hering–Breuer deflation reflex in the human neonateRespiration Physiology, 2000