Processing of pronouns with gender-inclusive –x in Spanish: An eye-tracking study
Open Access
- 2 June 2025
- journal article
- Published by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) in Social Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 20, 1-39
Abstract
Psycholinguistic research on gender-inclusive language has mainly focused on the processing of stereotyped nouns, while other work has centered on the processing of gender-inclusive morphemes (GIMs). This study focuses on Spanish and, by means of an eye-tracking technique, it examines the early and late processing of pronouns ending with the gender-inclusive morpheme –x, in comparison to those ending with the canonical masculine morpheme –o and the feminine morpheme –a. It also considers emerging trends between –x and extralinguistic factors, such as gender identity, sexual orientation, experience with gender studies, and attitudes towards GIMs. Spanish-speaking university students in Puerto Rico completed a sentence reading task and a questionnaire that collected information pertaining to four extralinguistic factors. Linear mixed-effects models display that processing –x is more costly than –o in all early and late reading measures, but more costly than –a only in some early and late reading measures. Furthermore, the random-effects structure showed an inverse relationship between these differences: the smaller the difference between –x and –o, the larger the difference between –a and –x. Emerging trends with extralinguistic factors suggest future studies should further explore their relationship with gender-inclusive morpheme –x. For a holistic understanding of gender-inclusive Spanish processing at the intersection of language and gender, these findings evince the importance of examining GIMs in comparison to both canonical morphemes and measuring both early and late processing.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorialJournal of Memory and Language, 2020
- Reducing a Male Bias in Language? Establishing the Efficiency of Three Different Gender-Fair Language StrategiesSex Roles, 2018
- Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed modelsJournal of Memory and Language, 2017
- Isolating stereotypical gender in a grammatical gender language: Evidence from eye movementsApplied Psycholinguistics, 2014
- Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximalJournal of Memory and Language, 2013
- How Readers Spontaneously Interpret Man-Suffix Words: Evidence from Eye MovementsJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2011
- Expectation-based syntactic comprehensionCognition, 2008
- Eye movements in reading words and sentences2007
- Modern Applied Statistics with S2002
- Eye Movements and Measures of Reading Time1998