ROTHAMSTED STUDIES OF SOIL STRUCTURE II. MEASUREMENT AND CHARACTERISATION OF MACROPOROSITY BY IMAGE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON WITH DATA FROM WATER RETENTION MEASUREMENTS
Authors:
- 1 September 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Soil Science
- Vol. 30 (3) , 391-413
Abstract
Summary: Macroporosity (>60 μm) in the three pairs of soils described in Part I was measured and characterized by image analyses. There are significant differences in macroporosity between the soils in each pair, particularly in the subsoil horizons. The results show that the Ragdale, Denchworth and Salop soils are more impervious than those of the Hanslope, Evesham and Flint soils. Comparison of the image analysis results with those derived from air content at 0.05 bar suction shows that in most cases macroporosity by the former is larger. In image analysis the maximum diameter of each pore is measured whereas the water retention method measures the diameter of the smallest exit point of each pore. Differences between the two types of measurement will thus be at a maximum in soils containing many large pores with narrow exit necks.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- PORE SPACE VARIABILITY IN A SUB‐SURFACE HORIZON OF TWO SOILSEuropean Journal of Soil Science, 1978
- The Function of Different Types of Macropores During Saturated Flow through Four Swelling Soil HorizonsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1977
- A Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivities Calculated with Morphometric and Physical MethodsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1974
- Relationships Between Soil Structure Characteristics and Hydraulic Conductivity1973
- Electro-optical soil porosity investigation by means of Quantimet-B equipmentGeoderma, 1972
- Modal Analysis of SoilsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1961
- THE USE OF THE MICROMETRIC AND OTHER METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF SOIL STRUCTURESoil Science, 1942