Factors Promoting a Good Outcome in a Second Microvascular Decompression Operation When Hemifacial Spasm is Not Relieved After the Initial Operation
Authors:
- 1 February 2017
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 98, 872.e11-872.e19
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: long-term outcome and prognostic factors, with emphasis on delayed cureNeurosurgical Review, 2012
- An analysis of failed microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasm: focused on the early reoperative findingsActa Neurochirurgica, 2010
- Microvascular Decompression in Patient With Atypical Features of Hemifacial Spasm Secondary to Compression by a Tortuous Vertebrobasilar SystemNeurosurgery, 2010
- Microvascular decompression for treating hemifacial spasm: lessons learned from a prospective study of 1,174 operationsNeurosurgical Review, 2010
- The Efficacy and Safety of Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm in Elderly PatientsJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2010
- Prognostic Factors of Hemifacial Spasm after Microvascular DecompressionJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2009
- Chronologic analysis of symptomatic change following microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: value for predicting midterm outcomeNeurosurgical Review, 2008
- Prognostic value of the lateral spread response for intraoperative electromyography monitoring of the facial musculature during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasmJournal of Neurosurgery, 2007
- Repeat microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasmJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2005
- Hemifacial spasm caused by vascular compression of the distal portion of the facial nerveJournal of Neurosurgery, 1998