Risk Factors for Nonunion in Patients with Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with Three Cannulated Screws Placed in Either a Triangle or an Inverted Triangle Configuration
Authors:
- Jui-Jung YangJYJui-Jung Yang
- Leou-Chyr LinLLLeou-Chyr Lin
- Kuo-Hua ChaoKCKuo-Hua Chao
- Shih-Youeng ChuangSCShih-Youeng Chuang
- Chia-Chun WuCWChia-Chun Wu
- Tsu-Te YehTYTsu-Te Yeh
- Yu-Tung LianYLYu-Tung Lian
- 2 January 2013
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 95 (1) , 61-69
Abstract
A triangle or an inverted triangle configuration, using failure of fixation as the primary outcome. Methods: Clinical and radiographic data for patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with either triangle fixation (one proximal screw and two distal screws) or inverted triangle fixation (two proximal screws and one distal screw), between January 1, 2000, and July 30, 2009, were analyzed. Results: A total of 202 patients, seventy-six men and 126 women with an average age (and standard deviation) of 64.53 ± 15.81 years (range, nineteen to ninety-three years), were included in the analysis. Union occurred in 158 patients, and nonunion occurred in forty-four. There were no differences between the union and nonunion groups with respect to age, sex, fracture side, fracture angle, fracture level, or estimated bone density. There were significant differences in fracture type, fixation configuration, reduction quality, and screw-tip subchondral purchase between patients with and without union. The estimated odds ratio for fracture nonunion was 2.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08, 7.96) in subjects with displaced fractures compared with those without displaced fractures (p = 0.035), 18.92 (95% CI, 1.91, 187.09) in subjects with borderline and unacceptable reduction compared with those with anatomic reduction (p = 0.012), and 2.92 (95% CI, 1.27, 6.69) for internal fixation with a triangle configuration compared with fixation with an inverted triangle configuration (p = 0.010). Conclusions: Screw fixation with a triangle configuration, a displaced fracture, and poor reduction are risk factors for nonunion in intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with fixation with multiple screws. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence....Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patientsInternational Orthopaedics, 2009
- Incidence of Fracture-healing Complications after Femoral Neck FracturesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2007
- Does Screw Configuration Affect Subtrochanteric Fracture after Femoral Neck Fixation?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2006
- The complications of displaced intracapsular fractures of the hipThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2005
- Management of intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly; is it time to rethink our strategy?Injury, 2004
- Percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures: the three point principleInjury, 1997
- Relationship of Mechanical Factors to the Strength of Proximal Femur Fractures Fixed with Cancellous ScrewsJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1996
- Cortical screw support in femoral neck fractures: A radiographic analysis of 87 fractures with a new mensuration techniqueActa Orthopaedica, 1993
- Implant holding power of the femoral headActa Orthopaedica, 1992
- Torsion and bending analysis of internal fixation techniques for femoral neck fractures: The role of implant design and bone densityJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1987