Competing, collaborating or controlling? Comparing benchmarking in European local government
Authors:
- Sabine KuhlmannSKSabine Kuhlmann
- Tim JäkelTJTim Jäkel
- 13 May 2013
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Public Money & Management
- Vol. 33 (4) , 269-276
Abstract
The way that local authorities in OECD countries compare and benchmark their performance varies widely. This paper explains some of the reasons behind the variations. The current local government benchmarking schemes in Europe— their governance, coverage and impact—largely depend on the institutional characteristics of the respective administrative and local government systems (in other words, the starting conditions). There are signs that, as a result of the fiscal crisis in Europe and need to cut public sector costs, many countries (but not England and Wales) are leaning towards compulsory large-scale benchmarking projects.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Angeleitetes Lernen über Leistungsvergleiche Zwischenbilanz nach acht Jahren Gemeindeprüfungsanstalt NRWDie Verwaltung, 2012
- Messung und Vergleich von Verwaltungsleistungen: Benchmarking-Regime in WesteuropaDie Verwaltung, 2011
- Voter involvement, fiscal autonomy and public sector efficiency: Evidence from German municipalitiesEuropean Journal of Political Economy, 2010
- Performance Measurement in European local governments: a comparative analysis of reform experiences in Great Britain, France, Sweden and GermanyInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 2010
- Validity, Utilization and Evidence-Based Policy: The Development and Impact of Performance Improvement Regimes in Local Public ServicesEvaluation, 2010
- EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTPolicy Studies, 2006
- Local Political Leadership: Nordic StyleInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2004
- Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different MeasuresPublic Administration Review, 2003
- Evidence and Policy and Naming and ShamingPolicy Studies, 2002
- The Performance Paradox in the Public SectorPublic Performance & Management Review, 2002