Intellectual Capital Measurement and Reporting Models
Author:
- 1 January 2015
- book chapter
- Published by IGI Global Scientific Publishing
- p. 117-139
Abstract
This chapter extends the earlier study of Bontis (2001) by critically reviewing the existing methods to measure and report intellectual capital. Bontis's (2001) study contributed significantly to the intellectual capital measurement and reporting literature. However, despite the growth in the field of IC and development and introduction of several new approaches to measure and report intellectual capital, no recent study has synthesized the IC measurement and reporting models. The objective of this chapter is to fill this gap in the literature by providing a critical review of 28 IC measurement models. To achieve this objective, the author partially adopts Sveiby's (2007) suggested classification scheme for categorizing the existing measurement models. The classification will enable the reader to uncover the common attributes of each model and to contrast the dissimilarities.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implementing the KPMG Value ExplorerJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2005
- IC valuation and measurement: classifying the state of the artJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2004
- National Intellectual Capital IndexJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2004
- Making Sense of Intellectual Capital2004
- Intellectual Capital Disclosure in Canadian CorporationsJournal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 2003
- Weightless wealth: four modifications to standard IC theoryJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2001
- Constructing intellectual capital statementsScandinavian Journal of Management, 2001
- Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capitalInternational Journal of Management Reviews, 2001
- Intellectual capital: current issues and policy implicationsJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2000
- The knowledge toolbox:European Management Journal, 1999