Clinicopathological implications of MET exon 14 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer – A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1 September 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Lung Cancer
- Vol. 123, 76-82
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment Rationale Study Design for the MetLung Trial: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III Study of Onartuzumab (MetMAb) in Combination With Erlotinib Versus Erlotinib Alone in Patients Who Have Received Standard Chemotherapy for Stage IIIB or IV Met-Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerClinical Lung Cancer, 2012
- Rationale and Design of MARQUEE: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Tivantinib Plus Erlotinib Versus Placebo Plus Erlotinib in Previously Treated Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic, Nonsquamous, Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerClinical Lung Cancer, 2012
- Immunohistochemical screening for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patientsLung Cancer, 2012
- Correlation between MET Gene Copy Number by Silver In Situ Hybridization and Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry in Non-small Cell Lung CancerJournal of Thoracic Oncology, 2012
- A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysisResearch Synthesis Methods, 2010
- Met gene copy number predicts the prognosis for completely resected non‐small cell lung cancerCancer Science, 2008
- Expression and mutational analysis of MET in human solid cancersGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 2008
- Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysisTrials, 2007
- Somatic Mutations Lead to an Oncogenic Deletion of Met in Lung CancerCancer Research, 2006
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002