Comparative Time Study of Conventional Cut-To-Length and an Integrated Harvesting Method—A Case Study
Open Access
Abstract
Logging residues offer a significant contribution to the economical profitability and sustainability of forest-based resources. It is always desirable to optimise the harvesting and extraction method to improve the economy of the process along with ensuring sustainability from an environmental point of view. This study compares two harvesting methods, i.e., conventional cut-to-length (CTL) followed by harvesting residue extraction for energy and an integrated harvesting method combining CTL with harvesting residue pre-piling by the harvester followed by the extraction of both timber and logging residues for energy. The study was carried out in spruce stands (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in South Moravia (Czech Republic) at Pozořice and Kuničky. Two methods utilized by harvesters and forwarders were compared. The first case was a conventional CTL method when trees are felled, delimbed, and cross-cut by the harvester. The resulting logs are pre-piled and then transported by the forwarder. In this case, the harvesting residues remain in the stand. The method does not involve utilizing harvesting residues such as brash mat on striproads but rather extracting them in an independent step as an energy source. In the second case, the resulting harvesting residues are piled up by the harvester to be later extracted by the forwarder. Such extracted harvesting residues are stored at the roadside for seasoning and future comminution. The aim was to obtain input data for internal analysis of a private entity contracting in a logging operation. The client demanded that the increase in time needed for the production of one timber unit with simultaneous harvesting residue preparation be measured. By our estimates, the integrated harvesting method required 33% more (harvester) and 16% less (forwarder) time compared to the alternate method for the extraction of harvesting residues, which in turn results in approximately 8% longer total operational time for the complete operation.Keywords
Funding Information
- Internal Grant at Mendel University (IGA) (PSV_2016008)
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-productivity analysis of South African pine sawtimber mechanised cut-to-length harvestingSouthern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science, 2016
- The COST model for calculation of forest operations costsInternational Journal of Forest Engineering, 2014
- Effect of log length on productivity and cost of Timberjack 450C skidder in the Hyrcanian forest in IranJournal of Forest Science, 2012
- The accuracy of manually recorded time study data for harvester operation shown via simulator screenSilva Fennica, 2008
- Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon BalanceGlobal Change Biology, 2005
- Productivity and Costs in Shelterwood HarvestingScandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2000
- Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree speciesForest Ecology and Management, 1997
- Evaluating Operator-Machine Interactions in Comparative Time StudiesJournal of Forest Engineering, 1995
- Weight equations for determining biomass fractions of young hardwoods from natural regenerated standsScandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 1995
- Distribution and yield of biomass from youngPinus sylvestrisandPicea abiesstands on drained and fertilized peatlandScandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 1986