ChatGPT’s Response Consistency: A Study on Repeated Queries of Medical Examination Questions
Authors:
- Paul F. FunkPFPaul F. Funk
- Cosima C. HochCosima C. Hoch
- Samuel KnoedlerSKSamuel Knoedler
- Leonard KnoedlerLKLeonard Knoedler
- Sebastian CotofanaSCSebastian Cotofana
- Giuseppe SofoGSGiuseppe Sofo
- Ali Bashiri DezfouliADAli Bashiri Dezfouli
- Barbara WollenbergBarbara Wollenberg
- Orlando Guntinas-LichiusOrlando Guntinas-Lichius
- Michael AlfertshoferMAMichael Alfertshofer
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 8 March 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
- Vol. 14 (3) , 657-668
Abstract
(1) Background: As the field of artificial intelligence (AI) evolves, tools like ChatGPT are increasingly integrated into various domains of medicine, including medical education and research. Given the critical nature of medicine, it is of paramount importance that AI tools offer a high degree of reliability in the information they provide. (2) Methods: A total of n = 450 medical examination questions were manually entered into ChatGPT thrice, each for ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4. The responses were collected, and their accuracy and consistency were statistically analyzed throughout the series of entries. (3) Results: ChatGPT 4 displayed a statistically significantly improved accuracy with 85.7% compared to that of 57.7% of ChatGPT 3.5 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, ChatGPT 4 was more consistent, correctly answering 77.8% across all rounds, a significant increase from the 44.9% observed from ChatGPT 3.5 (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: The findings underscore the increased accuracy and dependability of ChatGPT 4 in the context of medical education and potential clinical decision making. Nonetheless, the research emphasizes the indispensable nature of human-delivered healthcare and the vital role of continuous assessment in leveraging AI in medicine.Keywords
Funding Information
- German Research Foundation Projekt-Nr. (512648189)
- Open Access Publication Fund of the Thueringer Universitaets—und Landesbibliothek Jena (512648189)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Associations Between United States Medical Licensing Examination Performance and Outcomes of Patient CareAcademic Medicine, 2023
- Comparing ChatGPT and GPT-4 performance in USMLE soft skill assessmentsScientific Reports, 2023
- Assessing the accuracy of ChatGPT references in head and neck and ENT disciplinesEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2023
- Chatbot vs Medical Student Performance on Free-Response Clinical Reasoning ExaminationsJAMA Internal Medicine, 2023
- ChatGPT performance in the medical specialty exam: An observational studyMedicine, 2023
- Sailing the Seven Seas: A Multinational Comparison of ChatGPT’s Performance on Medical Licensing ExaminationsAnnals of Biomedical Engineering, 2023
- Large language models encode clinical knowledgeNature, 2023
- ChatGPT’s quiz skills in different otolaryngology subspecialties: an analysis of 2576 single-choice and multiple-choice board certification preparation questionsEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2023
- Artificial Intelligence Is Trusted Less than a Doctor in Medical Treatment Decisions: Influence of Perceived Care and Value SimilarityInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2020
- The Evolution of Machine Intelligence1992