Determining quarantine length and testing frequency for international border opening during the COVID-19 pandemic
Open Access
- 8 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Travel Medicine
- Vol. 28 (7)
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the closure or partial closure of international borders in almost all countries. Here, we investigate the efficacy of imported case detection considering quarantine length and different testing measures for travellers on arrival. Methods: We examine eight broad border control strategies from utilizing quarantine alone, pre-testing, entry and exit testing, and testing during quarantine. In comparing the efficacy of these strategies, we calculate the probability of detecting travellers who have been infected up to 2 weeks pre-departure according to their estimated incubation and infectious period. We estimate the number of undetected infected travellers permitted entry for these strategies across a prevalence range of 0.1–2% per million travellers. Results: At 14-day quarantine, on average 2.2% (range: 0.5–8.2%) of imported infections are missed across the strategies, leading to 22 (5–82) imported cases at 0.1% prevalence per million travellers, increasing up to 430 (106–1641) at 2%. The strategy utilizing exit testing results in 3.9% (3.1–4.9%) of imported cases being missed at 7-day quarantine, down to 0.4% (0.3–0.7%) at 21-day quarantine, and the introduction of daily testing, as the most risk averse strategy, reduces the proportion further to 2.5–4.2% at day 7 and 0.1–0.2% at day 21 dependent on the tests used. Rapid antigen testing every 3 days in quarantine leads to 3% being missed at 7 days and 0.7% at 14 days, which is comparable to PCR testing with a 24-hour turnaround. Conclusions: Mandatory testing, at a minimal of pre-testing and on arrival, is strongly recommended where the length of quarantining should then be determined by the destination country’s level of risk averseness, pandemic preparedness and origin of travellers. Repeated testing during quarantining should also be utilized to mitigate case importation risk and reduce the quarantining duration required.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Medical Research Council (NMRC/CG/C026/2017_NUHS, COVID19RF-004)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costsThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2020
- Evaluation of Testing Frequency and Sampling for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Surveillance Strategies in Long-Term Care FacilitiesJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2020
- Why COVID-19 Transmission Is More Efficient and Aggressive Than Viral Transmission in Previous Coronavirus Epidemics?Biomolecules, 2020
- Strategies at points of entry to reduce importation risk of COVID-19 cases and reopen travelJournal of Travel Medicine, 2020
- Perceived efficacy of COVID-19 restrictions, reactions and their impact on mental health during the early phase of the outbreak in six countriesRoyal Society Open Science, 2020
- COVID-19 Diagnostics, Tools, and PreventionDiagnostics, 2020
- Institutional, not home-based, isolation could contain the COVID-19 outbreakThe Lancet, 2020
- Profile of RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2: A Preliminary Study From 56 COVID-19 PatientsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected PneumoniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidenceThe Lancet, 2020