Differences in composition, muscularity, muscle:bone ratio and cut dimensions between six lamb genotypes
Authors:
- D.L. HopkinsDHD.L. Hopkins
- N.M. FogartyNFN.M. Fogarty
- D.J. MenziesDMD.J. Menzies
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Meat Science
- Vol. 45 (4) , 439-450
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developmental patterns of muscle, bone, and organ growth in foetal lambs of five genotypesNew Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 1995
- Comparison of Texel- and Suffolk-sired crossbred lambs for survival, growth, and compositional traitsJournal of Animal Science, 1993
- Elliotdale and crossbred lambs: growth rate, wool production, fat depth, saleable meat yield, carcass composition and muscle content of selected cutsAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1992
- An objective measure of muscularity: Changes with animal growth and differences between Genetic lines of southdown sheepMeat Science, 1991
- Genetic variations in subcutaneous adipose tissue metabolism in sheepAnimal Science, 1988
- Carcass composition of crossbred lambs by ten sire breeds compared at the same carcass subcutaneous fat proportionAnimal Science, 1987
- Comparison of terminal sire breeds for growth and carcass traits in crossbred lambsAnimal Science, 1985
- Value of conformation as an indicator of sheep carcass composition within and between breedsAnimal Science, 1981
- Carcass characteristics of heavyweight crossbred lambs. II.* Carcass composition and partitioning of fatAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1979
- Carcass characteristics of heavyweight crossbred lambs. I. Growth and carcass measurementsAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1979