The Pluriversality of Efforts to Reduce Deforestation in Brazil over the Past Decade: An Analysis of Policy Actors’ Perceptions
Open Access
Abstract
Brazil offers a complex and unique example of tropical landscapes. The country has considerably decreased deforestation since 2004, but Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is arguably under question, both as a concept and as a tool to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, as deforestation levels have increased over the last five years. This article investigates how different policy actors have perceived REDD+ over time, how they have engaged in REDD+ efforts over the past decade, and how REDD+ implementation in Brazil should move forward accordingly. We analyzed qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and actors’ “stances”, i.e., their positions—with regards to key issues connected to REDD+ governance and its challenges—over three different time periods (Phase 1: 2010–2011, Phase 2: 2015–2016, and Phase 3: 2019), so as to identify the practical implications of these diverse interpretations. We argue that the way actors perceive REDD+ is intimately related to the way they interpret and assign meanings towards it and, in consequence, the way they coordinate REDD+-related practices and efforts. We focus on the link between perceptions and efforts so as to comprehend the relevance that different interpretations have to both the concept and implementation of REDD+ in Brazil. Our analysis concentrates on the potential to improve the coordination and integration of REDD+ implementation and diverse actors’ efforts with regards to REDD+ activities. Results suggest that actors’ perceptions of REDD+ generated a plurality of meanings, highlighting a range of dialectical and ontological interactions that have, in turn, resulted in multiple REDD+ interpretations. Findings highlight that different actors have the same interests when it comes to their organizational efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, suggesting that there is room for a better coordination of efforts towards this end, as well as increased collaboration.Keywords
Funding Information
- Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz (grant no. 15_III_075)
- Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid (QZA-16/0110 nr 1500551)
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lessons for REDDplus: A comparative analysis of the German discourse on forest functions and the global ecosystem services debateForest Policy and Economics, 2012
- Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2012
- Forest Voices: Competing Narratives over REDD+IDS Bulletin, 2011
- Integrating distributed work: comparing task design, communication, and tacit coordination mechanismsStrategic Management Journal, 2010
- Hostage to Norms: States, Institutions and Global Forest PoliticsGlobal Environmental Politics, 2005
- Beliefs and Perceived Influence in a Natural Resource Conflict: An Advocacy Coalition Approach to Policy NetworksPolitical Research Quarterly, 2005
- The evolving forests regimeGlobal Environmental Change, 1999
- Games Real Actors Could PlayJournal of Theoretical Politics, 1994
- Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of RiskJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1991
- Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested SynthesisJournal of Public Policy, 1986