Extracapsular spread and adjuvant therapy in human papillomavirus‐related, p16‐positive oropharyngeal carcinoma
Authors:
- James S. LewisJLJames S. Lewis
- Bruce H. HaugheyBHBruce H. Haughey
Open Access
- 15 November 2011
- Vol. 118 (14) , 3519-3530
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extracapsular spread (ECS) is commonly used to justify adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. The role of ECS as a prognosticator and adjuvant therapy determinant in surgically resected, human papillomavirus‐related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), however, has never been determined.METHODS: Of 210 oropharynx patients in a prospective transoral laser microsurgery database, 152 patients who had p16‐positive primary OPSCC and pathologically positive necks were eligible for the study. ECS was measured from routine reporting (ECSreport) and by using a novel histologic grading system (ECSgraded). Proportional hazards models and matched analyses were used to compare the impact of ECS and adjuvant therapy on disease‐free survival (DFS). Patients with and without graded ECS were matched for T‐stage, surgical margins, and adjuvant therapy.RESULTS: At a median follow‐up of 43 months, the presence of ECS was not associated with poorer DFS in multivariate analyses (ECSreport: hazard ratio [HR], 3.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45‐25.88; P = .23; ECSgraded: HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 0.88‐7.34; P = .09). T‐stage and high‐grade ECS, ie soft tissue metastasis (STMgraded) were prognostic. Overall and in the presence of ECS or even STM, adjuvant CRT was not associated with better DFS over radiotherapy alone (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.06‐1.13; P = .07). In addition, matched analyses demonstrated no significant reduction in DFS for the presence of ECS versus the absence of ECS or reduced DFS for the administration of adjuvant radiotherapy alone versus CRT in ECS‐positive patients.CONCLUSIONS: Routinely reported ECS was not prognostic in this study. Adjuvant CRT versus radiotherapy alone produced no improvement in DFS for ECS‐positive patients. The authors propose that de‐escalated adjuvant therapy should be considered for patients with p16‐positive OPSCC who undergo surgery and that routinely reported ECS should not be used to justify adjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 2012;3519–3530. © 2011 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human Papillomavirus and Survival of Patients with Oropharyngeal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Is the improved prognosis of p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma dependent of the treatment modality?International Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) ± adjuvant therapy for advanced stage oropharyngeal cancerThe Laryngoscope, 2009
- Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patientsRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2009
- Factors Associated With Severe Late Toxicity After Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: An RTOG AnalysisJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Trends in head and neck cancer incidence in relation to smoking prevalenceCancer, 2007
- High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Affects Prognosis in Patients With Surgically Treated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell CarcinomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Distribution and impact of lymph node metastases in oropharyngeal cancerActa Oto-Laryngologica, 2006
- Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in tonsillar cancer: Clinical correlates, risk of relapse, and survivalInternational Journal of Cancer, 2000
- Management of Carcinoma of the Supraglottic Larynx: Evolution, Current Concepts, and Future TrendsThe Laryngoscope, 1996